BASE HEADER

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Ffurflenni 481 i 484 o 484
ID Ffurflen: 85748
Ymatebydd: North Warwickshire Borough Council

Yes

Issue S4: Growth of existing settlements Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy? NWBC Response – Yes -Agreed, similar approach taken in North Warwickshire Local plan.

ID Ffurflen: 85798
Ymatebydd: Mr David Burns

Dim byd wedi’i ddewis

Growth of existing settlements should only be considered where it does not require development in the greenbelt. Previous growth of existing settlements in non-greenbelt locations should not prevent further development and infrastructure should be invested to support further non-greenbelt development. Where growth of existing settlements cannot be assured without using greenbelt land, alternative solutions should be considered that do not involve development in greenbelt land.

ID Ffurflen: 85827
Ymatebydd: Barratt David Wilson Homes (Mercia)
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Yes

Appendix 1 Stratford-upon-Avon Segment 5 and 6: There is potential for the development of land at Copham’s Hill, Stratford-upon-Avon (ref. ID 385) for a mixed-use scheme (see Appendix A to D). The analysis of the proposed site should also consider its potential for improved connectivity (see Appendix C). The analysis notes that part of the site sites within a flood zone. However, the proposed Copham’s Hill site excludes development in areas of higher flood risk (see Appendix A and B). In light of the site’s potential for a significantly improved connectivity to the adjacent town centre and its exclusion of the areas of higher flood risk, it is considered that the site should result in a connectivity grade of A or, at minimum, B.

ID Ffurflen: 85904
Ymatebydd: Lenco Investments
Asiant : RPS

Yes

Ni roddwyd ateb