Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1817

Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1840

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Cheatham

As referred to previously, infrastructure not viable.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2053

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: mr john jacques

because it is based on biased unproven numbers provided by New Labour to suit own ends in getting relected, to get votes from mass of welfare dependent unemployed/unemployable hangers-on it has created in 11 years of mismanagement.


and insufficent consideration of views of local peopel and affect on environment.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2168

Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Emphasis should be places on Parish level information setting the framework (9.9)

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2317

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: S B Hoyles

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2375

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Rycroft

YOUR OWN CORE STRATEGY SAYS IT PERFECTLY!!!!!!!

"9.8 - It is clearly not possible or appropriate within the Core Strategy to identify, or plan for, what the local need should be in terms of new
development within each of the villages. The 'TOP-DOWN' approach of allocating development, such as new housing or employment, to specific sites around the villages is NOT considered a REALISTIC OPTION as it would be CONTRARY TO NATIONAL AND REGIONAL POLICY and would be UNLIKELY to achieve the objective of strengthening rural communities."

Why then is it ok to put 4,500 houses around Bishops Tachbrook (a rural
community)?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2393

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roy Standley

No.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2432

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly

Object.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2493

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: British Waterways

Yes

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2556

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Nifer y bobl: 2

As long as it does not provide inappropriate housing expansion.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2618

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2679

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Yes.

Sylw

ID sylw: 2708

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp

Priority must be given to affordable housing combined with provision of local social facilities

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2741

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

Housing allocations should meet local needs and be locally driven e.g. by Parish Councils. Village schools should be supported and helped to survive during times of lower recruitment.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2792

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

There should be a sensitive approach to small villages and their beauty preserved.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2833

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2872

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Susan Butcher

Object.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2928

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

This Preferred option is thoroughly welcomed provided proper, full, local consultation and meeting only the community's clearly identified needs (and wishes) is irrevocably enshrined policy.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2979

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Strongly disagree

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3021

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Bill McCutchon

The amount of unnecessary pain this will inflict on the local population with no identifiable gain for them and the loss of the opportunity which should be taken to spread the requirement for housing over a wider area to include the sensible development of rural communities, many of which are finding it difficult to survive as communities witnessed by the closure of schools, local shops, post offices, public houses etc.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3083

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3147

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

This Preferred option is thoroughly welcomed provided proper, full, local consultation and meeting only the community's clearly identified needs (and wishes) is irrevocably enshrined policy.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3159

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.C Hadfield

Small villages eg Leek Wotton should not be turned into mini towns

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3267

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

Local shops are not supported because it is cheaper to go to supermarkets, this a fact of life. If rural housing is so good just visit rural areas around Tamworth district.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3395

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3645

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Again the issue of highway infrastructure and/or public transport to outlying areas must feature in any plans to expand our villages.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3699

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3870

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Diane Freeman

The area will be overfilled with 3500 houses and it will be very difficult to use Green Lane for traffic. The road is quite small.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3933

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andrea Telford

Affordable housing is a must with extra services, eg. Post offices and bus services.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4039

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke

Yes - flexiblity of approach and develpopment where needed/ appropriate must be right - and with urban development too in ourtrelatively small area.