Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5811

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Cox

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5845

Derbyniwyd: 13/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Pamela Payne

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5890

Derbyniwyd: 05/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs C G Price

Extra housing would again lead to more traffic.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5916

Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Roberts

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5994

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Harris

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6070

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6125

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Richard and Judy Swallow

Nifer y bobl: 2

Subject in all cases to a planning application in some form being presented and considered, out 'reactive' reponse to this and option it: this one OK

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6186

Derbyniwyd: 13/10/2009

Ymatebydd: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6314

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Cheatle

The site is an eyesore and can only improve either by housing or preferably 'green' area.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6342

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Jessamine

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6387

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ed & Zoe Rycroft

Nifer y bobl: 2

The site would be much better if it was re- developed.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6440

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: graham leeke

But should provide more than 225 homes.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6523

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Neil Chisholm

Why only 75 dwellings? Site could take a greater level of housing.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6567

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs J C Honnoraty

1A and 1B would create traffic problems but preferable to area 1E, 1F, 2F and 3F, all of which would have the problem of accessing the north of Warwick and Leamington Spa by one of only two bridges across the Avon.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6692

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

support

Sylw

ID sylw: 6713

Derbyniwyd: 05/11/2009

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council - Heritage & Culture (Museums)

Land at Former Ford Foundry, Leamington:
We have no objection in principle to this allocation, provided that the foundry site is assessed in respect of its significance in terms of industrial archaeology, and appropriate recording undertaken in advance of site clearance.

Sylw

ID sylw: 6765

Derbyniwyd: 06/11/2009

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council [Commissioning, Planning & Partnerships Service, Children, Young People & Families]

The nearest primary school is Kingsway Primary School which is forecast to have no surplus reception places beyond 2010 when this site is developed. The development would require 15 primary school places, and could be provided through the expansion of an existing school.

Early Years provision will also be required, totalling 2 fte places.

The development is forecast to generate 11 secondary school places. A further, 3 post 16 places will also be required.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6866

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Binswood Allotment Society

support

Sylw

ID sylw: 6937

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Land at Former Ford Foundry & Land at Station Approach
The Parish Council‟s independent analysis shows that this site L08 should be linked with L28 & L35 to give a comprehensive development site. By amending the ratio of housing to other uses from 20%:80% to a mixed use of 65% residential, 20% office based employment & 15% recreational, with an average dph of 50, the number of homes could increase from 225 to 350.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6996

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Supported

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 7453

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Trilogy

Asiant : Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Support as part of mixed use development, but question the appropriateness of identifying non strategic sites in the Core Strategy.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 7555

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr George Jones

support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7637

Derbyniwyd: 14/12/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Boyle

Asiant : Brown and Co

In terms of land allocations, we do feel that insufficient consideration has been given to the wider regional picture and that too much details is provided on the strategic sites. We feel that there are other more suitable sites available and that at this stage the plan should be more general in terms of its direction for growth without site specific details being put forward. If these are not deliverable, as we understand has yet to be proved, then the plan may generally not be deliverable and sustainable.

Sylw

ID sylw: 7707

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ray Bullen

This site, L08, should be linked with L28 & L35 to give a comprehensive development site. By amending the ratio of housing to other uses from 20%:80% to a mixed use of 65% residential, 20% office based employment & 15% recreational, with an average dph of 50, the number of homes could increase from 225 to 350.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 33578

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Revelan Group

Asiant : Harris Lamb

It is premature to allocate land for development until a comparative site assessment is undertaken based on a robust evidence base.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 33649

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd

Asiant : Barton Willmore

Do not consider this site will come forward for development before 2016 due to little developer interest and given the number of constraints on site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 33665

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Asiant : Barton Willmore

Do not consider this site will be delivered before 2016 due to little developer interest and the number of constraints to this brownfield site.

Sylw

ID sylw: 33871

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Environment Agency

The site lies adjacent to Flood Zones 2 & 3. The proposed redevelopment of the site must not encroach into the flood zones.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 33923

Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council

Supports location