Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1310

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Sarah Jane Horsley

support

Sylw

ID sylw: 1345

Derbyniwyd: 06/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs G Field

Nifer y bobl: 2

The woodland at Thickthorn, which our property backs onto, has served as a natural buffer for various activities that have taken place on the site. The established woodland is also the natural habitat of wildlife, which includes a species of bat.

A condition of any planning consent given should be total preservation of the woodland.

Sylw

ID sylw: 1436

Derbyniwyd: 27/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Kris Cietak

Keep the existing mature woodland out of the plans in this area

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1517

Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Hamilton

Good location

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1640

Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009

Ymatebydd: William Bethell

Again, my limited support without details of supporting infrastructure.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1694

Derbyniwyd: 27/08/2009

Ymatebydd: J.G Whetstone

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1739

Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Object

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1767

Derbyniwyd: 20/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Max Bacon

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1831

Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Sylw

ID sylw: 1876

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Don't know particular area but think it is not as congested as Warwick.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1943

Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Ferguson

L/Spa Kenilworth will be one town.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2100

Derbyniwyd: 06/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Nick Booker

I do not support this option - it is not all clear from where the employment opportunities for the people who would live in this development would come from. Kenilworth does not have the infrastructure to support a major development of this nature

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2187

Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Further expansion onto greenfield sites is objected to.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2326

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: S B Hoyles

Object.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2402

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roy Standley

Yes.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2441

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly

Totally Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2481

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: David Elbourn

Why should Kenilworth be made to expand in support of Coventry and Leamington housing requirements when the Infrastructure of roads schools and amenities cannot support additional housing, all of the additional people will work and shop outside of the town.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2541

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Debbie Millican

Kenilworth has alrady had more development than is fitting for a small town. If this proposed development were to go ahead it would place more strain on the already busy roads and would devalue the existing housing in the proposed development area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2558

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Nifer y bobl: 2

The building of affordable housing/industrial units in a currently prime residential area would be detrimental to the area and destroy a significant portion of green belt. The woodland area is a habitat for wild life and current tree preservation orders are important for this.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2586

Derbyniwyd: 13/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Clarke

The land is green belt for a reason and the very nature of green belt designation is made to protect land from development, especially and particuarly something as extensive as this proposal.
The Glasshouse Lane and Birches Lane road structure cannot take the traffic loading that this development would bring,even withstanding the affect it would have on existing residents and unlashing the volume of road traffic to the A46 Thickthorn island would be overwhelming.
I would urge the Caoncil to ensure appropriate ex-industrial sites are fully utilised before any consideration to any other site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2590

Derbyniwyd: 13/09/2009

Ymatebydd: mr Martin Turner

Do we really need more homes in Kenilworth ?, what about the schools, what about the conservation of the environment, what about saving the little green belt that makes Kenilworth what it is. The new homes already being built in Kenilworth are not selling so why build more to stay unsold

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2591

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Penn

The volume of traffic in Glasshouse Lane is already far too high owing to its use as a "rat run". Where will the access roads be put in? Will schools, doctors etc. be able to cope with a larger population? Kenilworth is supposed to be a small country town - not a suburb of Coventry.
Cannot the old Peugeot site at Ryton be used for extra housing?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2600

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Richard Storey

Stongly oppose all extensions of Kenilworth, but especially any more which shifts the distinction between Kenilworth and Coventry.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2627

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Will have greater impact to residents than other areas.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2634

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr James Delaney

Kenilworth already developed to its limits. Traffic is already excessive for a historic town of this nature. Inadequate infrastructure for increased housing (roads too narrow, parking issues, etc).
Greenbelt land should be protected - risk of follow up (A46 ribbon development) to be considered.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2641

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jennifer Maisey

Kenilworth is such a lovely place to live at present. Development on this Greenbelt would be a travesty when there are brownfield sites to be utilised elsewhere. Traffic congestion, noise pollution, destruction of woodlands and green fields covered in concrete. For whose benefit? Not Kenilworth residents thats for sure!

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2725

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp

Violation of green belt, urbanisation of a rural area requiring major infrastructural changes and increase in traffic.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2750

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

Good as close to A46 so no great incursion into open countryside.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2778

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: MS Carol Roe

Kenilworth is loosing it's character and becoming a continuous sprawl of estates.There has been to much poor development in Kenilworth with green areas disappearing. The local schools are oversubscribed with local children refused places. The roads are difficult to traverse with the bus in Moseley Rd rerouted as it is unable to get passed the parked cars. NO new estates or housing till infrastructure is improved and leave some green areas for our children.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2779

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Professor Mark Pollicott

This area already has too much traffic for the existing roads, partly due to its use as a route to the A46 avoiding the center of Kenilworth. Moreover, construction of housing on this green field site would significantly change the character of the area, as well as overburdening local amenities.