Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 46208

Derbyniwyd: 07/06/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Steve Taylor

Asiant : Mr Steve Taylor

The 40% threshold is too high and will render many potential rural developments unviable, resulting in fewer housing starts and the curtailing of the supply of affordable rural housing.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 46273

Derbyniwyd: 20/06/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Smith

How affordable are these really going to be?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 46324

Derbyniwyd: 03/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Horsley

I dispute the need for affordable housing on the basis that the SHMA is a theoretical model. No one has polled the people of Whitnash to ask whether or not they need over 500 affordable houses in order to meet the neds of that community. My concern is that people for whom sociable and cooperative coexistence is a challenge, will be brought into the area as has happened throughout the past decade. Thus local needs are not being met for local people.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 46527

Derbyniwyd: 17/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

In village locations Aff Home building should solely meet local need in terms of mubers and interms of housing type/mix.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 46629

Derbyniwyd: 19/07/2012

Ymatebydd: G Ralph

Affordable homes are needed. But 40%. Where does this figure come from? What evidence is there to justify te number?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 46652

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Rod Scott

The requirement that 40% of homes in rural areas must be affordable may be counter productive. Affordable homes in rural areas should be provided to meet local needs only.
Developers must contribute towards the cost of producing Affordable housing where it is needed if no affordable housing is needed locally.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 46706

Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Joanna Illingworth

The 40% rule should be applied to all developments for more than 3 houses, whether rural or urban. The 10 houses threshold in urban areas encourages piecemeal infill development which is not desirable.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 46779

Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mrs Cathy Jorgensen

The Norton Lindsey Housing Needs Survey of November 2011, identified the need for 3 new affordable homes in Norton Lindsey. Taking the survey results and applying your requirement for 40% of new homes on developments of 5 or more dwellings in rural areas to be affordable housing, Norton Lindsey would require additional 7-8 new dwellings, significantly less than the 30-80 new houses proposed under the Local Plan. This is an indication that the village does not have the need, nor the capacity to cope with such proportionately large development.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 46883

Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacqueline Crampton

Support in principle provision of affordable housing by developers.
As someone who used to take these allocations for an RSL I would suggest the targets were more flexible i.e. bedspaces not homes. Developers meet targets offering small flats, when RSL's need larger homes for families or even elderly accomdation to release under-occupied homes.
Provision needs to be assessed on a site by site basis.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 46895

Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Rural Community Council

Affordable homes are increasingly required for the level of need to be met over the plan period.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 47174

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Langton

Fully support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 47249

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr. Christopher Farr

I support the general thrust of this option with the proviso that the needs of the locality not the district be met. There is no point in providing affordable housing where it is difficult to get to doctors, hospitals, schools etc.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 47430

Derbyniwyd: 02/08/2012

Ymatebydd: Mrs Larraine Curzon

In favour of 40% of housing on new developments being affordable

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 48505

Derbyniwyd: 07/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr David Jackson

Support provisoion of affordable housing, but 40% affordable housing on the proposed sites will lead to
a) lower sale prices thereby reducing the float for infratsructure
b) burden on the local taxpayer.
A better approach given the lack of brown field sites is to reverse recent trends of council house sales and buy existing housing stock particularly where renovation may be needed.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 48770

Derbyniwyd: 06/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Peter and Philippa Wilson

Nifer y bobl: 2

Will the rents be subsidised? Commercial rents are not within the reach of many families and individuals.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 49798

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr John Mould

Support proposals for affordable housing, but this should be at 50% for rental accommodation, flats for young people, retirement accommodation and reasonably priced homes for young families.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 49832

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Clare Spruce

Supports the policy that requires 40% of homes on new housing sites to be delivered as affordable units.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 49993

Derbyniwyd: 03/08/2012

Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates

Asiant : Pegasus Group

The requirement for 40% affordable housing should remain flexible as this level will not be deliverable on all sites.
The Affordable Housing Viability assessment failed to take into account site remediation and the provision of infrastructure. These can impact on viability. It is important, therefore, to ensure that the policy is flexible.