BASE HEADER

C.

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 1 i 7 o 7

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 46411

Derbyniwyd: 06/07/2012

Ymatebydd: mr william tansey

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

These are positive steps which will help revitalise some communities which are losing their character.

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 46565

Derbyniwyd: 18/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Dr Kate Holtby

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I agree with Mr Tansey - these are positive changes with positive benefits.

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 46575

Derbyniwyd: 18/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Roger Mills

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I fully support limited development under the circumstances described, but would point out that this paragraph is totally inconsistent with the previous two paragraphs (PO16, Items 1 & 2) - both of which advocate developments which I consider to be "inappropriate"!

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 47210

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: The National Trust

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy is not consistent with the NPPF, which allows for limited infilling of previously developed sites in Green Belt and for the provision of facilities for outdoor recreation.

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 47257

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Dr GUy Barker

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

this seems a reasonable response to increased demand for local housing without allowing massive developments

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 47348

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Cockburn

Asiant : Mrs Deborah Prince

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Para16.9 needs further clarification and expansion.Other forms of
diversification need considering and extensions to existing schemes
included.

-Guidance and advice to farmers on appropriate types of diversification is
essential.

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50081

Derbyniwyd: 20/07/2012

Ymatebydd: RPS Planning & Development

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The wording of the last bullet of policy PO16 (C) is considered to be particularly poorly worded at present, as it is not clear whether Part C applies to all previously-developed land, or only previously-developed land in Category 3 villages. If the latter, this is much more restrictive than the NPPF. We suggest that the final bullet point of Policy PO16 is reworded as detailed below.