BASE HEADER
Justification for the Preferred Option for the Green Belt
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46638
Derbyniwyd: 19/07/2012
Ymatebydd: G Ralph
The exceptional circumstances that are required to change the existing green belt have not been demonstrated.
The exceptional circumstances that are required to change the existing green belt have not been demonstrated.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46725
Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Joanna Illingworth
This section has little to say about agriculture and food production. It regards the Green Belt in the main as a playground for the residents of urban areas.
This section has little to say about agriculture and food production. It regards the Green Belt in the main as a playground for the residents of urban areas.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46878
Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mark Robins
Redrawing the Green Belt in NL is not required, over the last thirty years the village has had a number of infill and brown site developments that have met the needs for new homes, whilst maintaining the integrity of this ancient Warwickshire hill top village. It can keep its historical environment by being allowed to evolve and not be radically changed by a development of 30-80 houses.
Redrawing the Green Belt in NL is not required, over the last thirty years the village has had a number of infill and brown site developments that have met the needs for new homes, whilst maintaining the integrity of this ancient Warwickshire hill top village. It can keep its historical environment by being allowed to evolve and not be radically changed by a development of 30-80 houses.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46913
Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Gillian Crisp
The existing Green Belt legislation has protected Norton Lindsey without preventing limited small development of required housing. It is very important that its protection remains in place.
The existing Green Belt legislation has protected Norton Lindsey without preventing limited small development of required housing. It is very important that its protection remains in place.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46948
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Julie Tidd
There is no clear evidence that this level of growth is required, and local people do not want it. Given this, there is no way it can be justifiable to destroy precious green belt land on the back of spurious projections. Once its gone its gone forever. There are no 'exceptional cirumstances' (and irrefutable proof of them) to make this type of plan acceptable or even sensible.
There is no clear evidence that this level of growth is required, and local people do not want it. Given this, there is no way it can be justifiable to destroy precious green belt land on the back of spurious projections. Once its gone its gone forever. There are no 'exceptional cirumstances' (and irrefutable proof of them) to make this type of plan acceptable or even sensible.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 47109
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Ms Lisa Abba
exceptional circumstances have not been met
exceptional circumstances have not been met
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 47238
Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012
Ymatebydd: ms cymone de-lara-bond
A failure to conduct a methodical approach to this issue leaves the proposed preferred options flawed.
A failure to conduct a methodical approach to this issue leaves the proposed preferred options flawed.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 47291
Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Miss Alison Reid
It is stated below that Green Belt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. A desire to build 180 houses is not 'an exceptional circumstance'. At the meeting at Woodloes School, the official in charge of the plan failed to recall even half of the 5 points to consider when deciding to alter Green Belt boundaries. He provided information contradictory to that which he had given on a previous occasion. He was also unaware of relevant environmental points made by those gathered, suggesting that sufficient consideration of the environmental implications of building on this land had not been given.
It is stated below that Green Belt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. A desire to build 180 houses is not 'an exceptional circumstance'. At the meeting at Woodloes School, the official in charge of the plan failed to recall even half of the 5 points to consider when deciding to alter Green Belt boundaries. He provided information contradictory to that which he had given on a previous occasion. He was also unaware of relevant environmental points made by those gathered, suggesting that sufficient consideration of the environmental implications of building on this land had not been given.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 50209
Derbyniwyd: 03/08/2012
Ymatebydd: Old Milverton & Blackdown JPC
Asiant : Hunter Page Planning
Joint Green Belt Study (JGBS)
- The JGBS indicated that variations in the quality of land in the green belt and therefore some areas around the towns may be considered for development and therefore, removed from the green belt. It is fundamental to note that green belt is not a designation for landscape quality, but rather a functional planning designation for the purposes set out in the NPPF.
- The scoring system of the green-belt study is not consistent with the up-to-date guidance set out in the NPPF.
- However landscape character and quality is an important consideration and is addressed by the Cooper Partnership Landscape Appraisal.
See attachments