BASE HEADER

Preferred Option(s)

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 1 i 4 o 4

Gwrthwynebu

Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries

ID sylw: 60599

Derbyniwyd: 12/12/2013

Ymatebydd: Mrs Christine Powell

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Environmental issues are of concern with development in the proposed option. It will completely spoil the landscape of the area and extra traffic will need to come into the village.
This is green belt land and we should not be eroding and seeking to spoil the countryside in this way. The need for housing is accepted but a more suitable site should be found which would not impact so severely on the landscape.

Gwrthwynebu

Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries

ID sylw: 60788

Derbyniwyd: 13/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr John Lock

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Comments made in July 2013 concerning the housing estimate of 12,300 have been ignored. An independent assessment, supported by our local MP, of 5,400 obviates the need to find room in the nominated villages. The 'housing estimate' needs re-assessment.
An additional 100-150 dwellings would have an adverse effect on existing amenities. The increase of some 300 residents (greater than the population of Hampton-on-the-Hill) would adversely affect the quality of life in the village .
The only route for all the heavy construction vehicles is through Hampton on the Hill. A new access road is needed to deal with this issue.

Gwrthwynebu

Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries

ID sylw: 60792

Derbyniwyd: 13/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Ben Davis

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No development should be allowed on green belt land, especially to the east and south of Hampton Magna as it would erode the limited countryside between the village and Warwick. The green belt is specifically designed to protect the green space between villages and towns.

Gwrthwynebu

Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries

ID sylw: 61153

Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Jeffrey Sayer

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Option 6 should be the preferred option and not option 1.