H03 East of Whitnash/South of Sydenham
Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 1 i 3 o 3
Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Bolland
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi
Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:
The objections relate to the loss of a public right of way, the lack of protection for a vital local amenity, possible air and noise pollution, the loss of the remaining rural views from and of Whitnash and the placing of a new community in Whitnash which has no real links to the rest of the community.
Testun llawn:
a) There is no provision for safeguarding existing rights of way (public bridleway) through the prop...
a) There is no provision for safeguarding existing rights of way (public bridleway) through the proposed site neither is there any plan for enhancement of access to the surrounding countryside and the network of bridleways and footpaths that Whitnash residents currently enjoy.
b) There is no provision for the protection of Whitnash Brook, an important local amenity, and the associated green infrastructure including the nature reserve.
c) No account appears to have been taken of the possible noise and air pollution from the adjacent main railway line and the low-lying situation of the site on the lee side of a high railway embankment.
d) No account has been taken of the effect on the local environment of a large housing development. It will destroy the remaining rural views from Whitnash which include the prominent Crown Hill and the ridge running through Harbury with its associated windmill (Chesterton Windmill). The fine views from Crown Hill to Whitnash and beyond will also be lost.
e) A new community will be tacked on to an existing one and although it will be in Whitnash it will not be an effective part of it because of the lack of suitable linking roads and footpaths.
[dangos mwy]
Ymatebydd: Midland Red (South) Ltd. dba Stagecoach Midlands
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi
Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:
Despite evidence previously given that this site cannot, by virtue of its location, be effectively served by public transport owing to its severance from the main bus network and its peripherality, it has nevertheless been included as a draft allocation.
The allocation is contrary to NPPF paragraph 14 being a fundamentally unsustainable location that cannot be made sustainable. It can only be wholly dependent on personal car use, with perhaps, soime limited scope for cycling.
Testun llawn:
Despite evidence previously given that this site cannot, by virtue of its location, be effectively s...
Despite evidence previously given that this site cannot, by virtue of its location, be effectively served by public transport owing to its severance from the main bus network and its peripherality, it has nevertheless been included as a draft allocation.
The allocation is contrary to NPPF paragraph 14 being a fundamentally unsustainable location that cannot be made sustainable. It can only be wholly dependent on personal car use, with perhaps, some limited scope for cycling.
[dangos mwy]
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd Homes Ltd
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi
Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:
Objection is made to the allocation of 300 dwellings because this underestimates the capacity of the site; masterplanning exercises indicate the capacity is aproximately 550 dwellings.
Testun llawn:
See attachment
