BASE HEADER

Mod PM36 - Policies Map

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 1 i 9 o 9

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68586

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Malone

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Kingshill development.....You have not considered the following:
Greenbelt, additional traffic generated, infrastructure, drainage, flooding, bats, crested newts, badgers, protected trees, destruction of local communities. Are you seriously considering this project, given the other possible developments in the area (HS2, JLR)? You will swamp the local villages with traffic and pollution. We are at breaking point and you are not listening to the electorate!

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68830

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Duncan Gowing

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to allocation: -
- poorly considered response to issues of unsoundness raised by inspector
- can't justify creating high density housing in Kings Hill when other areas are lower density e.g. Nuneaton and Bedworth and could contain higher density development
- loss of green space and impact on / loss of green belt
- flood risk exacerbated from Finham Brook
- adverse impact on drinking water
- lack of capacity at sewage works
- loss of farmland
- poor accessibility to site
- loss of protected trees, hedgerows and habitats
- adverse impact on wildlife, ecology and historic environment

Atodiadau:

Cefnogi

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69172

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Lioncourt Strategic Land - Andy Faizey

Asiant : Savills

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

SUPPORT the allocation of additional land for housing at Kings Hill and associated amendment to the Urban Area Boundary (Site Ref: H43, Policies Map 36). SUPPORT the removal of land from the Green Belt at Kings Hill.

Atodiadau:

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69232

Derbyniwyd: 22/05/2016

Ymatebydd: Severn Trent Water (Supply Team)

Asiant : GL Hearn

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Omission Site:
Allocate land at Finham Sewage Treatment Works as additional employment provision associated with Kings Hill, to allow for additional housing development to be provided at Kings Hill.

Atodiadau:

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69295

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Parklands Consortium Ltd

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to proposals:
- contrary to NPPF
- area previously preserved
- proposal to remove site capable of containing 4,000 houses to provide for 1,800 houses unjustified
- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated
- no landscape analysis of whole of SMA that justifies removal of site from green belt

Atodiadau:

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69563

Derbyniwyd: 19/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. David Edwards

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

-The greenbelt should be preserved and developments on brownfield sites preferred.
-The proposed plan will destroy fields, wildlife and reduce light on our property.
-It will also increase pollution, noise and traffic.

Atodiadau:

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69706

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Woodland Trust

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We are pleased to see Wainbody Wood excluded from development in new paragraph 1.09 of modification 21 and protected from associated impacts and would like to see this cross referenced to modifications 16 and PM36.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 70087

Derbyniwyd: 11/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Miss Jennifer Instone

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The level of development proposed in this area is too much. More brownfield sites should be developed and utilised for flats.

Atodiadau:

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 70249

Derbyniwyd: 11/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Instone

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Coventry map - development too crowded in the area

Atodiadau: