Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 72167

Derbyniwyd: 08/05/2022

Ymatebydd: Ms Juliet Carter

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

5.6 1, 2 & 3 Again we are seeing the use of the word "considering" rather than obliging developers to comply with tthe regulations that are being set in order to get to net zero.
What consultation has been done with environmentally sustainable concious bodies to advise practical measures to inform council staff and developers? Other carbon issues to consider in developments are vegetation destruction, particularly mature trees which absorb carbon, biodiversity loss (often avoidably), cycle routes should be completed before the houses are constructed.

Sylw

ID sylw: 72172

Derbyniwyd: 01/06/2022

Ymatebydd: Mr Keith Thompson

I can see no direct justification for the particular targets set out in the policy (minimum 63% and 30% reductions). Both seem unambitious. It would be good to include a phrase like "carbon neutral or negative buildings will be prioritised but the minimum..."

Sylw

ID sylw: 72204

Derbyniwyd: 01/06/2022

Ymatebydd: Barratt David Wilson Homes (Mercia)

Asiant : Savills

Please see attached.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 72210

Derbyniwyd: 08/06/2022

Ymatebydd: Home Builders Federation Ltd

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

For the Warwick Net Zero Carbon DPD to be found sound under the four tests of soundness as defined by the 2021 NPPF (para 35), the DPD must be positively prepared, justified, effective and consistent with national policy. The HBF consider that Policies NZC1, NZC2(A – C) and NZC3 are unsound.