Other

ID sylw: 95051

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lynette Sutton

Difficult to follow.
Quite complicated to fully understand

No

ID sylw: 95092

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms C Clifton

As above

No

ID sylw: 95205

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jason Giblen

I object to proposal of building on land HELAA part A land off Malthouse Lane.
This land is a haven for wildlife such as newts, shrews, deer some of which are protected and would loose their habitats
Detrimental impact on amenities which are already strained; schools, sewage, road network
Loss of area of beauty which is enjoyed by residents and visitors daily
Significant traffic and parking issues already which would be increased greatly
Threatens loss of privacy and overshadowing to current properties
Lack of property need as current properties for sale on Malthouse Lane not selling

No

ID sylw: 95235

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Douglas coote

There is a potential for more flooding in surrounding areas if the development in this elevated position at Ardens Grafton and Temple Grafton is considered.
The agricultural grade 1 and 2 land is currently actively farmed and are council farms. These should not be sold for development as it is a gateway into farming for young farmers of the future

Yes

ID sylw: 95256

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alamo

Asiant : Harris Lamb

A longer plan period accords with guidance para 22 of the NPPF. A two part plan will delay the identification of smaller non-strategic allocation which should be addressed through a policy provision to allow such sites to come forward in advance of the part 2 plan.

No

ID sylw: 95277

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Ford

1. Road Infrastructure – Already totally inadequate
2. Green belt land / Wild life destruction, including resident deer
3. Severe lack of Public Transportation in the area, leading to increase in traffic
4. Severe lack of Policing support, with likely increase in ASB
5. GP / Medical Facilities – Already over stretched

I don’t believe any houses built in the proposed location would be deemed affordable housing, and there are many other non-green belt sites far more suitable area, with better infrastructure, with less disruption to local wildlife.

Yes

ID sylw: 95399

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Wynford Grant

Useful background

No

ID sylw: 95494

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Karen Clegg

Land South of Chichester Lane, Hampton Magna REFID: 55.
I oppose this site as it will break up purpose built landscaped land, trees and hedges which are part of the green belt. It is unsustainable to continue taking land out of the green belt to hit sustainability targets. It will lead to loss of privacy as our homes will be overlooked, contributing to reduction of light and creating unwanted noise and smell.
There were previously water and sewerage issues on the Hampton Trove site so building here would only exacerbate these problems.

Yes

ID sylw: 95499

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Britton

Design of residential development and materials used should respect the local vernacular. The site layout should also have an eye to vistas possibly closed by key buildings some having a communal use.
.

No

ID sylw: 95620

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Wilson Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

We suggest that the plan period should be extended to 2055 to allow for a 30 year plan period as per the guidance in para 22 of the Framework. We are concerned that preparing a two part plan will unduly delay development coming forward in other locations that are not new settlements or strategic growth locations. Sites in the SAP should be considered suitable for allocation.

No

ID sylw: 95654

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: mr david nicholas

i consider that the C1 area is completely unrealistic as a proposed site as the location is in a rural area with inadequate infrastructure and will negatively impact the green belt . the roads are not compatible with the higher level of traffic and would lead to dangerous levels of driving. The area is used extensively for leisure cycling and walking. The local services of schools and the 2 doctor GP surgery are completely impractical for such growth

Yes

ID sylw: 95889

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

yes

No

ID sylw: 95993

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kiril Kolev

We will lose 600 hectares of farm land, take away public views from the tops of the burton Dassett hills, deeply harm the wild life, impact the local farming increase traffic from the proposed site the, potential damage to heritage of the local villages that parts of date back to the 1200 if adequate infrastructure is built. Increase in CO2, no infrastructure to cope with the extra rain water and the clay soil once saturated will create floodings. Not enough schools and aurgeries. Lastly it will kill the small friendly village communities.

No

ID sylw: 95994

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Greenly

I object to the destruction of our green belt, biodiversity prime farm land and food security
I object to the destruction of habitat
I object to the urban creep, when brownfield sites are available.
I object to the plans that do not take account the needs of current and future residents
I object to the increase in air pollution, the lack of affordable green transport provision
I object that current inadequate infrastructure, schools, hospitals, roads, railways is assumed to be capable of supporting these plans
I object.

No

ID sylw: 96077

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Suzanne Mccarthy

We are a remote part of Stratford, little or no usable bus service. No local schools within walking distance. We live in an area of outstanding beauty, roads are not suitable with the influx of visitors as it is .,without vast estates being built .no shops ( except a local 1) train line that runs every hour only and they are cancelled at the drop of a hat . Need houses to be built closer to amenities. Schools, doctors , hospitals .shops , libraries .none of these are really accessible from here without own transport .

Yes

ID sylw: 96266

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Newbould

na

Yes

ID sylw: 96275

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

It should be clearer that you have to submit each bit. A lot of what I have already entered including attachments has been lost.

Yes

ID sylw: 96358

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Julia Shearing

Too many houses ruining a once beautiful market town. no ring road, far too many huge juggernauts coming over the bridge from Long Marston constantly causing tail backs all the way to Clifford Garden Centre, Waitrose, up Bordon Hill, to main Warwick roundabout etc. incredible poor planning and whoever is in charge of Road, Highways should be ashamed.

No

ID sylw: 96386

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

Concerns about the Part 1 and Part 2 Plan approach.
The Plan must identify deliverable sites for the first five years post-adoption (2028-2033). While existing commitments help, new allocations are needed.
For strategic allocations in Part 1 to contribute to 5YHLS, clear evidence of housing completions within five years is required.
Delivery may be delayed if detailed policies, masterplans, and design codes follow in the Part 2.
The Councils should consider whether it needs to supplement Strategic Policies in Part 1, and whether a Part 2 Plan is the correct approach if early delivery of strategic allocations is anticipated.

No

ID sylw: 96399

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neil Haywood

Should not be giving any more green belt land for housing developments.
Too many new houses in and around Kenilworth already.

Yes

ID sylw: 96462

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Colin Stewart

Yes

Yes

ID sylw: 96475

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cotswold District Council

No comments on the introduction

No

ID sylw: 96487

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Ashley Ha

I strongly object to the proposed development due to significant negative impacts on quality of life. Increased noise, air pollution, and loss of privacy will directly affect residents. The plan fails to guarantee supporting infrastructure, such as roads, schools, and healthcare, before construction begins. Additionally, the loss of green space contradicts the plan’s sustainability goals. The Preferred Options document holds limited planning weight at this stage, and I hope the Council to reconsider site allocations, prioritising brownfield sites over residential areas. Public concerns must be genuinely addressed, not just formally noted.

Yes

ID sylw: 96537

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

Supportive of the proposals in the introduction. However, locations detailed in fig 6 & table 5 appear to be driven by Call for Sites data rather than by determining where growth is desirable and then researching land availability. For example growth is not desirable in SG17 as it does not fit any of the attributes of 'Growth Corridors'. The infrastructure is not capable of supporting the last ten years growth let alone future growth. Yet, as a large area of green field land has been offered for sites it seems as though this has driven its SG designation.

Yes

ID sylw: 96735

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council note the information included in this Chapter.

No

ID sylw: 96950

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 96997

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Victoria Alcock

No, I do not broadly support the proposals. I support a few of the proposals. I am only supporting the new town proposals. No new houses in Stratford town as the infrastructure just cant cope.

New settlements will at least provide new schools, roads, doctors all thats needed

Yes

ID sylw: 97314

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy White

N/A

No

ID sylw: 97421

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rhiannan Lewis

No

No

ID sylw: 97428

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

we support the plan period. We are concerned that the decision to prepare a part 2 plan could delay delivery on non-strategic sites in lower order but sustainable settlements in advance of the part 2 plan being adopted. We are seeking a policy or mechanism that would allow smaller sites in these settlements to come forward in advance of the plan being adopted.