Other

ID sylw: 102516

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Propernomics Ltd

Justification also includes para 74 of the NPPF which says that neighbourhood planning groups should also give particular consideration to the opportunities for allocating small and medium-sized sites.

Other

ID sylw: 102521

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Adam Griffiths

Small scale development needs to emphasise the community led element - many such developments just enable land owners to generate income and are not in the best interests of the community.

Yes

ID sylw: 102526

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Penelope Beswick

Small scale development on multiple sites is much more preferable in relatively small towns like Warwick, Kenilworth and Leamington Spa than vast swathes of development by volume house builders taking over green belt land on the periphery of such towns.

Yes

ID sylw: 102541

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Norrie

This seems reasonable.

Yes

ID sylw: 102649

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Phoebe Withnall

If applied properly, draft policy direction 3 could help prevent uncontrolled urban sprawl. Setting clear Built Up Area Boundaries (BUABs) gives certainty over where development is expected, and supporting Neighbourhood Development Plans allows local communities to shape growth.

No

ID sylw: 102660

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Diana Taulbut

The use of Green Belt should be for "exceptional needs" - and whilst 'local affordable housing' sound very worthy, in real terms there is no such thing in this case. It ought to mean proper secure rented council accommodation which cannot be sold off. In practice, due to exceptionally-high values of Green Belt development land, the usual failure to implement anything like a 40% 'affordable' (ie slightly discounted) housing by private developers and WDC to hold them to it, all that will happen is another private development of 5-bed exec homes in a lovely location. It's just not feasible.

Other

ID sylw: 102777

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

The potential for smaller scale developments to fulfil a significant role in meeting future growth needs should be recognised and given as much importance as strategic allocations. Existing settlement boundaries should be reviewed and new boundaries created. Tanworth-in-Arden contains 2 HELAA B sites (515 and 758) to allow smaller scale development supporting its services and facilities and in villages nearby.

Green Belt policy changes need to be fully taken on-board, e.g. Site 758 is Grey Belt. This is likely to increase the number of small-scale developments.

In a predominantly rural area, small sites should contribute significantly > 10% of supply.

Other

ID sylw: 102854

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Louisa Smith

I do not believe that green belt should be built on willy nilly. We are in the middle of a climate emergency and we need to have green space, woodlands, agricultural land and space for nature.

Yes

ID sylw: 102941

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes

Asiant : Marrons

Bloor Homes appreciates the importance of small sites towards ensuring a 5-year land supply. It is recognised that strategic growth allocations alone will not be sufficient to meet this target, and that other methods should be used along with the strategic allocations in order to identify the appropriate sites to do this.

Yes

ID sylw: 103031

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Emmerson

I support the concept of Built up Area Boundaries and consider that limited infilling should be permitted within strict controls where these areas are located within the Green Belt. Building on large gardens, however, should not generally be permitted as they make an important contribution to the vidsual environment in built up areas and provide an impoortant habitat for wildlife.

The provision of affordable housing is especially important to enable young people to live in the areas where they have their roots. Therefore, limited provision of affordable housing within existing built up areas within the Green Belt may be acceptable.

No

ID sylw: 103037

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Christine Easton

Unfortunately I still have to disagree with this one too. Leave our green belt alone!
Most of the rest of the plan seems feasible. 5 years is sensible too.

Again leave our beautiful Cotswold alone!

Yes

ID sylw: 103075

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Small existing settlements without infrastructure should not be developed for anything other than small scale development

Other

ID sylw: 103098

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon

Asiant : Turley

There needs to be more clarification throughout the SWLP about what a ‘Strategic Allocation’ is and what a ‘small-scale development’ is.

Richborough encourage the SWLP authorities to consider the sites put forward through the Call-for-Sites and how these align with the ‘Spatial Growth Strategy Priority Areas 1 to 3’ and provide sufficient information within the SWLP to allow these sites to be delivered.

Other

ID sylw: 103099

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

There needs to be more clarification throughout the SWLP about what a ‘Strategic Allocation’ is and what a ‘small-scale development’ is.

Richborough encourage the SWLP authorities to consider the sites put forward through the Call-for-Sites and how these align with the ‘Spatial Growth Strategy Priority Areas 1 to 3’ and provide sufficient information within the SWLP to allow these sites to be delivered.

Other

ID sylw: 103101

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Lighthorne Road, Kineton

Asiant : Turley

There needs to be more clarification throughout the SWLP about what a ‘Strategic Allocation’ is and what a ‘small-scale development’ is.

Richborough encourage the SWLP authorities to consider the sites put forward through the Call-for-Sites and how these align with the ‘Spatial Growth Strategy Priority Areas 1 to 3’ and provide sufficient information within the SWLP to allow these sites to be delivered.

Other

ID sylw: 103104

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton

Asiant : Turley

There needs to be more clarification throughout the SWLP about what a ‘Strategic Allocation’ is and what a ‘small-scale development’ is.

Richborough encourage the SWLP authorities to consider the sites put forward through the Call-for-Sites and how these align with the ‘Spatial Growth Strategy Priority Areas 1 to 3’ and provide sufficient information within the SWLP to allow these sites to be delivered.

Other

ID sylw: 103107

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Asiant : Turley

There needs to be more clarification throughout the SWLP about what a ‘Strategic Allocation’ is and what a ‘small-scale development’ is.

Richborough encourage the SWLP authorities to consider the sites put forward through the Call-for-Sites and how these align with the ‘Spatial Growth Strategy Priority Areas 1 to 3’ and provide sufficient information within the SWLP to allow these sites to be delivered.

Other

ID sylw: 103111

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne

Asiant : Turley

There needs to be more clarification throughout the SWLP about what a ‘Strategic Allocation’ is and what a ‘small-scale development’ is.

Richborough encourage the SWLP authorities to consider the sites put forward through the Call-for-Sites and how these align with the ‘Spatial Growth Strategy Priority Areas 1 to 3’ and provide sufficient information within the SWLP to allow these sites to be delivered.

Other

ID sylw: 103113

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

There needs to be more clarification throughout the SWLP about what a ‘Strategic Allocation’ is and what a ‘small-scale development’ is.

Richborough encourage the SWLP authorities to consider the sites put forward through the Call-for-Sites and how these align with the ‘Spatial Growth Strategy Priority Areas 1 to 3’ and provide sufficient information within the SWLP to allow these sites to be delivered.

Other

ID sylw: 103255

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Summers Family

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

The plan should recognise the potential for smaller scale developments to fulfil a significant role in meeting future growth needs. This should be quantified and given as much importance as strategic allocations.

It is important to stress that the changes to the approach on Green Belt in the December 2024 version of the NPPF needs to be fully taken on-board, including the fact that Elmhurst Farm (Site 518) can be considered as Grey Belt.

No

ID sylw: 103355

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neal Appleton

Infill is controversial. Rural character is determined as much by the space between buildings as it is by the buildings themselves. Infill kills this character and results in pastiche development.
Limits for small-scale development. This figure should be consistent with the target for each settlement. For example, a village with a 20-year target of 50 homes, equates to 10 small-scale developments of 5 homes each; or one every 2 years. The scale of development should reflect the target. Ten is too large. Villages with a poor transport network should be considered unsuitable for developing at any scale.

No

ID sylw: 103460

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs S Farmer

A BUAB is meant to be a boundary that has been put in place for good reason, and building the other side of the boundary with an undefined threshold is vague and weak and renders the boundary pointless.

Whilst there is a difference between a huge development and a ‘small’ one, how many ‘small’ ones will be allowed to nibble away at the boundary until it’s no longer a boundary at all?

No

ID sylw: 103543

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Laura Nicholas

As a local resident, I strongly oppose SG05’s abd SG06's inclusion in the Local Plan. This development would destroy greenbelt land, harming biodiversity and depriving residents of vital outdoor space used for walking, exercise, and community activities. HS2 has already disrupted Cubbington- enough is enough. Infrastructure, including roads, schools, and healthcare, is overstretched, and further growth will worsen congestion and strain services. Offchurch Road and Windmill Hill are already too fast and unsafe for heavy traffic. Cubbington has a distinct village identity, which this development threatens to erase. The council must reconsider SG05 and protect our already pressured community.

Yes

ID sylw: 103566

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jack Casey

Agree with Caveats. It is important that the Plan either allocates small and medium sized sites, including in sustainable villages, or has a policy provision that allows for such sites to come forward. On that basis the proposal to allow small and medium sized sites to come forward adjacent to the built up area boundaries is welcome.

Yes

ID sylw: 103602

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr ian shenton

.

Other

ID sylw: 103768

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sarah Shalgosky

Current boundaries have no effect whatsoever and are increasingly infringed. Infilling has a detrimental effect on settlements with narrow access, intensifying congestion and neighbourhood disputes. If you going to impose boundaries, is there any chance they will be respected because currently, they are not.

No

ID sylw: 103814

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Scott Haberton

Cramming full housing estates into nice environments oversaturates facilities, and depletes nice areas.
Deliberate effort needs to be made to balance these areas with cultural, ecological and other factors to make them holistic NICE places to be. More houses alone is not the answer

No

ID sylw: 104192

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Mary Harman

It focuses on not upholding green belt protections for historic villages and open countryside or considering heritage and
food security.

Yes

ID sylw: 104250

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Amanda Waters

none

Other

ID sylw: 104327

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

Additional restrictions should be placed in small scale developments in green belt locations, including only allowing these in previously built up areas.