No

ID sylw: 97874

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stan Copley

I'm completely against Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire. This will lead to overdevelopment of existing small and medium communities who are being saddled with expanding for South Warwickshire Growth Needs already. This will lead to greatly increased and unnecessary commuter traffic and urban sprawl. No amount of sweet talking and promises will make the reality of this and better. Birmingham and the Black Country need to sort their own issues out.

No

ID sylw: 98237

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Woodward

N/a

No

ID sylw: 98243

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Woodward

N/a

No

ID sylw: 98288

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Elkington

Both Birmingham and Coventry have had their housing requirements reduced despite having a large number of Brownfield sites and being the areas where most jobs are located. There is an overstatement of the housing requirements for Coventry so South Warwickshire should resist any attempts to provide for them. Indeed, the policy whould work in reverse and they take on some of the South Warwickshire requirements.

Other

ID sylw: 98325

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Catesby Estates

Asiant : Mr Will Whitelock

We support the recognition that there may be a need to look to accommodate ‘unmet need’ from the Coventry and Warwickshire Housing Market Area (HMA) and the Greater Birmingham and Black Country HMA. However, there is no detail to comment on at this stage.

No

ID sylw: 98356

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Daine Davis

South Warwickshire is required to accomodate more than enough new housing without taking additional overflow from adjacent urban areas

No

ID sylw: 98405

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Holly Farm Business Park

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

There is a need for greater certainty and quantification on meeting cross-boundary needs. The suggestion in the Policy Direction for the capacity to be identified on reserve site released only when supply in the source area falls below 5 years is unworkable. Also, this forgets that some of the requirement might be for employment development. The strategic proximity of Holly Farm Business Park to the conurbation and Coventry is well-placed to help meet any such shortfall.

Other

ID sylw: 98461

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Philip Sykes

This can only make sense if any proposed accommodation within Stratford on Avon District is on the Northern/North-Western side of the District boundary. To do otherwise would meet with catastrophic commute difficulties for both work and education.

No

ID sylw: 98483

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy Flynn

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

The National Planning Policy Framework states, at paragraph 11b), that strategic policies should provide for the objectively assessed needs for housing and other uses, as well as any needs that cannot be met within neighbouring areas. This need for cross boundary provision is reiterated in Framework paragraph 36 a). As drafted, Policy Direction 4 does not go far enough towards meeting the needs of the Greater Birmingham and Coventry areas. Some cross boundary requirements are
already acknowledged yet the SWLP does not currently propose to make any allocations to meet those needs from the outset and should be amended to do so, reflecting the latest information available.
That notwithstanding it remains appropriate for the SWLP to allocate additional sites which can be released if there is a shortfall against the Districts’ own requirements or needs arising from adjacent areas. A policy of reserve sites must be clearly set out in the SWLP and not left to a separate document, to be adopted at a later date.

Yes

ID sylw: 98672

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

It is imperative that the SWLP adequately considers accommodating unmet housing needs arising from outside of South Warwickshire. There are significant unmet needs arising from the GBBCHMA which require attention, and potential unmet needs arising from Coventry which should be taken account of accordingly. There is also potential for unmet needs arising from Cotswold District, Redditch Borough and Solihull Metropolitan Borough which should be considered. Failure to do so would render the SWLP not positively prepared nor effective and thus unsound in line with Paragraph 36 a) and c) of the NPPF.

Yes

ID sylw: 98714

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Makestone Strategic Land - Hampton Lucy

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

It is imperative that the SWLP adequately considers accommodating unmet housing needs arising from outside of South Warwickshire. There are significant unmet needs arising from the GBBCHMA which require attention, and potential unmet needs arising from Coventry which should be taken account of accordingly. There is also potential for unmet needs arising from Cotswold District, Redditch Borough and Solihull Metropolitan Borough which should be considered. Failure to do so would render the SWLP not positively prepared nor effective and thus unsound in line with Paragraph 36 a) and c) of the NPPF.

No

ID sylw: 98802

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Old Milverton and Blackdown Parish Council

OMBJPC is aware that South Warwickshire is bounded by Coventry and Redditch and there may be unmet needs from those areas than have to be accommodated. However, it is clear from the previous Inspector’s Report (2017) that addressed this matter, development to meet the unmet needs of Coventry will need to be located adjoining Coventry, rather than the edge of Leamington. The same principle would apply to Redditch.
In particular, land in the West Midlands Greenbelt should not be used to accommodate housing need from other areas as this would defeat the purpose of the West Midlands Greenbelt.

No

ID sylw: 98807

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Hayward Developments Ltd

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

RESPONSE TO SWLP PREFERRED OPTIONS SUBMISSION
HAYWARD DEVELOPMENTS LTD
MARCH 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth
Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
The National Planning Policy Framework states, at paragraph 11b), that strategic policies should
provide for the objectively assessed needs for housing and other uses, as well as any needs that
cannot be met within neighbouring areas. This need for cross boundary provision is reiterated in
Framework paragraph 36 a). As drafted, Policy Direction 4 does not go far enough towards meeting
the needs of the Greater Birmingham and Coventry areas. Some cross boundary requirements are
already acknowledged yet the SWLP does not currently propose to make any allocations to meet
those needs from the outset and should be amended to do so, reflecting the latest information
available.
That notwithstanding it remains appropriate for the SWLP to allocate additional sites which can be
released if there is a shortfall against the Districts’ own requirements or needs arising from adjacent
areas. A policy of reserve sites must be clearly set out in the SWLP and not left to a separate
document, to be adopted at a later date.

No

ID sylw: 98962

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: (1) AG Family Trust 2024 & (2) N. Holdsworth

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

There is a need for greater certainty and quantification on meeting cross-boundary needs. The suggestion in the Policy Direction for the capacity to be identified on reserve site released only when supply in the source area falls below 5 years is unworkable. Also, this forgets that some of the requirement might be for other types of development.

Other

ID sylw: 98977

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacqueline West

Only if they can be accomodated on brownfield sites. Should not take land in South Warwickshire out of agricultural production for needs from outside South Warwickshire.

Energy production by solar PV is another demand currently met by loss of agricultural land. All new sites must be designed and built to have PV on ALL roofs (only exceptions being if obscured by trees with TPOs or pre-existing tall buildings to be retained in the development) and all car parks must be covered with solar panels.

No

ID sylw: 98985

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: MPTL

Asiant : Harris Lamb

No, Draft Policy Direction 4 refers to housing needs only. There is no reference to the fact that South Warwickshire may be required to provide employment land to support the growth of the Coventry and Warwickshire HMA or the Greater Birmingham and Black Country HMA

Yes

ID sylw: 99028

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: J & E Evans Properties Limited

Asiant : Marrons

It is imperative that the SWLP adequately considers accommodating unmet housing needs arising from outside of South Warwickshire. There are significant unmet needs arising from the GBBCHMA which require attention, and potential unmet needs arising from Coventry which should be taken account of accordingly. There is also potential for unmet needs arising from Cotswold District, Redditch Borough and Solihull Metropolitan Borough which should be considered. Failure to do so would render the SWLP not positively prepared nor effective and thus unsound in line with Paragraph 36 a) and c) of the NPPF.

No

ID sylw: 99042

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Wyatt

It is clear that both Coventry and Birmingham have vacant capacity for development and therefore this MUST be fully realised before any consideration for accommodating them. Also any such accommodation must be hand in hand with greatly improved transport links to those areas. The current arrangements are grossly inadequate.

No

ID sylw: 99056

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Keep Hatton Station Rural

As B1 is in green belt land and Ancient Arden, the area should be doubly protected from urban sprawl. There is the potential for towns to begin to merge and that would contribute to the nature of the separation of settlements.

Yes

ID sylw: 99068

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Nurton Developments

Asiant : Chave Planning

Nurton Developments Ltd (NDL) agrees with the approach to accommodating growth needs arising outside South Warwickshire.

Yes

ID sylw: 99081

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Nurton Developments (Loes Farm) Ltd

Asiant : Chave Planning

Nurton Developments Ltd (NDL) agrees with the approach to accommodating growth needs arising outside South Warwickshire.

Yes

ID sylw: 99098

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Nurton Developments (Lapworth) Ltd

Asiant : Chave Planning

Nurton Developments Ltd (NDL) agrees with the approach to accommodating growth needs arising outside South Warwickshire.

No

ID sylw: 99254

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Kennedy

Any approach to accommodate growth needs arising outside South Warwickshire should be rigorously challenged. In the previous local plan we took on growth from Coventry that was based on figures of demand that have now proved to be incorrect.

No

ID sylw: 99274

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

We are concerned with the lack of detail and references within the draft policy.

Other

ID sylw: 99283

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I agree that SWLP should accommodate shortfall from Coventry and Birmingham but only if it is proved that all available sites have been used in these places. The current plan has reduced the housing allocation for Coventry by approx. one third and loaded the hosing onto South Warwickshire. This implies there are still brownfield sites in Coventry that will be unused.

No

ID sylw: 99287

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Rawlings

South Warwickshire should not accommodate ANY growth needs that arise from outside the area.

Other

ID sylw: 99295

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

There is a need for greater certainty and quantification on meeting cross-boundary needs. The suggestion in the Policy Direction for the capacity to be identified on reserve site released only when supply in the source area falls below 5 years is unworkable. Also, this forgets that some of the requirement might be for other types of development.

No

ID sylw: 99444

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diane Wilson

See previous comments

No

ID sylw: 99532

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jean Bull

South Warwickshire should not be used for this shortfall from outside of the area.

Other

ID sylw: 99557

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

While generally supporting the policy, in communities like Southam where the average house price is more than ten times the average income there is a concern that this policy could lead to further difficulties for local people being able to afford to live in their home community. Somehow the Plan needs to address this concern.