Yes

ID sylw: 94867

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment

No

ID sylw: 95611

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jon Redhead

I personally feel that the present strive towards 'net zero', and 'carbon neutral' is a financially floored target, that will not be at all viable for decades. The take-up of EVs, Ground source heat pumps, and various 'low carbon' paraphernalia has not been widely embraced, as it has proven too costly, and people remain unconvinced that this fast move towards it is a good thing. An unchecked increase in UK population growth has had the most negative increase in carbon emissions that cannot be slowed to a net zero anytime in the future, if it continues at present rate.

Other

ID sylw: 95840

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Carter

The criterion relating to renewable energy generation in new developments should be strengthened to require the installation of solar panels in all cases.

Yes

ID sylw: 95927

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

yes

Yes

ID sylw: 96034

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Marshall

Provided that the provisions of the plan are adhered to.

Yes

ID sylw: 96322

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

ID sylw: 96562

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

Agree

Yes

ID sylw: 96700

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

Yes

Yes

ID sylw: 96890

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

This is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

ID sylw: 97145

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

Yes

ID sylw: 97483

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr HUGH KEEP

Reducing the area's carbon footprint needs to be a priority in my view.

Yes

ID sylw: 97576

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brenda Stewart

no comment

Yes

ID sylw: 97611

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Winter

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 97729

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 98522

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Holly Farm Business Park

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Agree, subject to no adverse impact on the overall viability of development.

Other

ID sylw: 99025

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: (1) AG Family Trust 2024 & (2) N. Holdsworth

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Agree, subject to no adverse impact on the overall viability of development.

Yes

ID sylw: 99050

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: MPTL

Asiant : Harris Lamb

Yes, we support this approach. It should be noted that the SG02 – Stoneleigh Park Employment Group development opportunity proposed through the Call for Sites submission includes a large area of renewable energy generation. This is a significant advantage of the proposed development.

Other

ID sylw: 99351

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Agree, subject to no adverse impact on the overall viability of development.

No

ID sylw: 99494

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Cocker

The following sentence is too weak: "The incorporation of renewable energy generation into employment development will be supported provided it is appropriate to the location and type of development". There are very circumstances where renewable generation would not be appropriate for a development, but the second part of the sentence above risks creating a loophole. Consequently, the sentence be upgraded to: "The incorporation of renewable energy generation will be required in employment development unless there is an exceptional reason against". This phrase still allows flexibility in the exceptional circumstances in which renewable generation is not appropriate.

Yes

ID sylw: 99530

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diane Wilson

Yes if within their current boundaries

Yes

ID sylw: 99739

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford District Council Green Group

This is the growing part of our economy, so should be a priority. Aviation land could be used for this.

Yes

ID sylw: 100136

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adrian Parsons

I agree with the approach laid out to support the growth of renewable energy generation which should be a requirement of all new developments, and also in supporting, not only in principal, but practically the green economy. There is huge potential in the green economy to provide employment, income and opportunities that should be actively encouraged to position South Warwickshire as a leader in this area.

Yes

ID sylw: 100324

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

NA

No

ID sylw: 100410

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Cooper

Whilst admirable the costs are of this are likely to restrict the adoption of green initiatives. Solar Farms have the reputation once suffered by double glazing salesmen and, given the rural nature of South Warwickshire, should be avoided at all costs.

No

ID sylw: 101180

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Culley

no stop wasting money on this

Other

ID sylw: 101268

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Adrian Summers on behalf of the Summers Family

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Agree, subject to no adverse impact on the overall viability of development.

Yes

ID sylw: 101376

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Bart Slob

I broadly agree with Draft Policy Direction 17 but believe stronger commitments are needed to ensure real progress toward a low-carbon economy. Encouraging businesses to adopt renewable energy, improve energy efficiency, and retrofit buildings is positive, but clear targets and incentives are necessary to drive adoption. Large-scale developments must demonstrate net-zero strategies and be located where sustainable transport options exist to reduce emissions. Additionally, Green Belt sites like SG04 should not be used for industrial expansion, as this contradicts sustainability goals. The plan must prioritise brownfield land and existing employment hubs to support genuine low-carbon economic growth.

No

ID sylw: 101605

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason

This development is not good for the y

Yes

ID sylw: 101808

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Crump

However, a truly low carbon economy will only be possible if developments such as that at Long Marston do not involve the need for new residents to use private motor vehicles for work, leisure and service centre journeys to and from the site. The rural location is not sustainable if carbon emissions will be increased through the need to travel by car and thus cause additional noise and air pollution. The reality is that incoming residents will necessarily have existing jobs miles away from the site as this will be the only means of financing their housing.

Other

ID sylw: 101948

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Bishop’s Tachbrook Parish Council supports the Draft Policy Direction but questions its effectiveness in shaping SWLP policies. Stronger wording is suggested to ensure employment development reduces its carbon footprint, retrofits improve energy efficiency and renewable energy generation is mandatory. Clarity is needed on how policies will be applied in planning decisions, particularly regarding businesses in the green economy. The Council also questions whether this policy is necessary, given Section 7 already addresses climate resilience. Additionally, it seeks clarification on whether compliance with energy-saving measures or direct contribution to the green economy is required for development approval.