BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-F- Decentralised Energy Systems?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86093
Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86258
Derbyniwyd: 18/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong
I strongly agree with the policy, with the concern that viability arguments will make this hard to enact in practice. How can we ensure that when testing viability, developer's calculations are independently and robustly checked?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86673
Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater
Decentralised energy systems should be required for new developments even if this is more expensive for occupants than existing (non sustainable) options.
The subsidy of carbon emissions to the current fossil fuel energy infrastructure is not sustainable and requires the public at large to bear the carbon consequences of the occupants energy usage.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86924
Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming
The authorities have a record of failure re this kind of thing - going down a direction which creates things that are not wanted/not sustainable/ too expensive. Avoid more failure but leaving well alone.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87026
Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025
Ymatebydd: S Gardner
And better community energy sharing and water harvesting
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87173
Derbyniwyd: 05/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Bryan Hay
The approach proposed seems very sensible.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87403
Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day
None
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87583
Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025
Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris
I agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88706
Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88829
Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson
No further comment
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89057
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
i agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89187
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Durk
Decentralised energy sources sound like an obvious choice but it is important that careful analysis is done. A CHP scheme running at 80% efficiency will less effective than heating from a condensing boiler at 95% efficiency together with zero carbon electricity from the grid, or even gas fired electricity from the grid at between 50 and 60%. if powered by genuinely renewable fuel the CHP scheme may prove to be more advantageous, but it would be unwise to assume that it would be the best option in all cases without serious analysis to back it up.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89263
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Jon Knight
The hierarchy of preference for heating/cooling sources is good. I'd recommend changing the last one to "fossil fuel fired heating/cooling" so that it covers other high carbon fuel sources such as oil or coal. There also may need to be clarity between renewables such as solar and wind and options such as biomass, as they have difference air quality implications.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89312
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Julie Hudson
Having investigated air source heat pumps, it occurred to me that it would be so much better to design in heat pumps at the development stage, because this would open up possibilities for ground source heat pumps. They are unlikely to be feasible or economic as retrofit. In other words, distributed energy thinking needs to be there from day one and developers selected on the basis of their ability to deliver on this in practical terms.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90067
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Catherine Hewson
helps to a degree.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91176
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council
All new builds should be required to install rooftop PV generation.
Consideration for ground source heating where practicable.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91671
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman
Sensible
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91765
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor
Should those communities which use the "heaviest" fossil fuels e.g. oil, coal, and who are not on mains gas be prioritised for support?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92463
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Julian Brown
Agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92566
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Fairburn
Reference should be made to grid powered heat pump district heating/cooling, under “Council will expect schemes to demonstrate proposed heating and cooling systems have been selected in line with the following order of preference”.
It should be above the gas-fired option, thus:
a) Connection with existing heating/cooling distribution networks
b) Site wide heating/cooling fed by renewables
c) Communal heating/cooling fuelled by renewable energy sources
d) Grid powered heat pump district heating/cooling
e) Gas fired heating/cooling
In fact the council should not be allowing gas fired district heating systems at all.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92963
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Blake
Gas fired??
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93134
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Penny Gray
Good initiative.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93185
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Checkley
Fully support this policy.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93237
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Coulsting
I agree with the basic approach laid out in Draft Policy-E- Protecting Large Scale Existing Renewable Energy Infrastructure. However fossil fuels should not be employed at all, either directly or to power CHP.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93643
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong
I agree with the draft policy. However, expectations in line with the order of preference suggested should be stronger. Planning applications should specifically and robustly demonstrate that options are unviable before being approved for lower ranking options.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93901
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Beverley Comley
All housing and business development should be fully investigated to ensure all energy reduction options are included. This needs to be stronger than proposed option.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94097
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Stuart Mace
Where developments are remote from existing infrastructure and connections, the provision of decentralised energy risks increasing the physical size of the development area or constraining capacity to the detriment of the quality of housing, employment or educational space provided.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94878
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group
The words here are confusing, from a homeowners perpective. "Decentralized heating systems are essentially the inverse of the centralized alternatives. Instead of having the single unit which distributes heat to the whole house, there are individualized units that control the heating within a single room or location. Decentralized heating systems allow individual control of the temperature in different areas of a building as needed. This ensures that heating costs are kept to a minimum."
Global experience of district heating systems is patchy, and not necessarily efficient. Installation costs and carbon used in manufacture and installation may make these undesirable.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94961
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council
yes – with the exception of it supporting energy generation from natural gas. Surely if the long term goal is for all new dwellings to be heated by heat pumps because of the lower carbon impact, this suggestion of using gas to generate heat is counter-intuitive. Might this conflict with DPD22 part A?
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95734
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western
Asiant : Marrons
It is not considered that the draft Policy, in its current state, is effective in accordance with Paragraph 36 c) of the NPPF. The current definition of ‘major’ development means that it will not be realistic to expect the majority of such applications to demonstrate the use of decentralised energy systems. The Councils will need to ensure that any Policy at Regulation 19 stage evidences the feasibility of decentralised energy systems for development and expectations in relation to the scale of development. Any approach should be viability tested.