Yes

ID sylw: 95457

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barrie Goodman

New developments should where possible be in areas of low flood risk with priority to Brownfield sites over Green Belt land.

Yes

ID sylw: 95605

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Davis

New developments should be in areas with the lowest flood risk. Brownfield land should be used for development as opposed to green belt or farmland.

No

ID sylw: 95704

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Wilson Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

No. Draft Policy J largely reiterates the guidance contained in the NPPF and PPG on Flood Risk and the Sequential Test. It is unnecessary to repeat national policy in the SWLP. The SWLP should simply direct the reader to the NPPF and PPG.

No

ID sylw: 95742

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

It is considered that the advice of Environment Agency should be applied in full to any policy relating to flood risk mitigation, rather than just partly applied as is the case with Draft Policy J.

Yes

ID sylw: 95756

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Amanda Dyhouse

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 95806

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Shelagh Marshall

Agree with the proposal.

Yes

ID sylw: 95849

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr UDAYA EEDUPUGANTI

New development should be prioritised in areas of lower flood risk.
Turning green field or farmland into urban areas increases flood risk.

Other

ID sylw: 95944

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

A definition is required for what constitutes a ‘major’ development within the policy. There needs to be a minimum number of dwellings specified for a Flood Risk Assessment to be required – small developments can cause flood issues to their neighbours and downstream if poorly designed. All development needs to demonstrate that they will not impact on existing development between the development site and the main rivers regardless of whether the proposed and existing development is within a flood risk area.

Yes

ID sylw: 96005

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Marshall

I see this as essential.

No

ID sylw: 96247

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Trevor Handcock

I do not belive this policy takes into account the effects of climate change adequately as well as the effects of a reduction in the land surface area drainage when all the additional housing and road structure is taken into account. This is particularly relevant to the surface water drainage of the Welcombe Hills around the Clopton quarter

Yes

ID sylw: 96339

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this draft Policy.

Other

ID sylw: 96553

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

A definition is required for what constitutes a ‘major’ development within the policy. There needs to be a minimum number of dwellings specified for a Flood Risk Assessment to be required – small developments can cause flood issues to their neighbours and downstream if poorly designed. All development needs to demonstrate that they will not impact on existing development between them and the main rivers regardless of whether the proposed and existing development is within a flood risk area.

Yes

ID sylw: 96907

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

I fully agree that flood risk is avoided by selecting land at least of flooding and that development should not place others at increase risk of flooding. In this context site BW would be unsuitable for development compared with all other settlement sites being considered.

Yes

ID sylw: 96989

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council support the approach laid out in draft policy J. Flooding is of real concern to our communities and development should not be permitted in areas which are likely to flood. No development should increase the risk of flooding elsewhere in the watercourse catchment area.
When development is proposed in an area prone to flooding, and relies on public flood defences to avoid flooding, the developer must prove that such flood defences continue to provide sufficient protection.

Yes

ID sylw: 96991

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

Any scale of development should reduce flood risk.
The downstream discharge rate from any surface water drainage or SUDS system must be limited to one third of the current green field runoff or one tenth of the current brownfield runoff.
There should be no development in any flood risk area.
There should be no housing development any closer to a flood risk area than the houses already built.

Yes

ID sylw: 97063

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Emily Morris

New development should be prioritised in areas of least flood risk. Turning green field land into urban development increases flood risks.

Yes

ID sylw: 97181

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

No

ID sylw: 97256

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

It is considered that the advice of Environment Agency should be applied in full to any policy relating to flood risk mitigation, rather than just partly applied as is the case with Draft Policy J.

Yes

ID sylw: 97359

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Guy Morris

Flooding is already an increasing problem in Stratford. new developments should be prioritised in greybelt and brownfield land, where it's far less likely to increase flooding risk, as it would with greenfield and farmland

Yes

ID sylw: 97376

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Lewin

We must learn from past floods and seek to avoid the loss of homes and businesses that we have seen in recent years.

Yes

ID sylw: 97391

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Godwin Developments

Godwin Developments agree that new development should be prioritised to areas of lowest flood risk. As set out in the Vision Document accompanying these representations, it is noted that land at Aylesbury Road is located entirely in Flood Zone 1 and therefore considered to have low probability of flooding from fluvial sources. Furthermore, it is noted that the risk of surface water flooding is “very low”.

No

ID sylw: 97473

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

Draft Policy J largely reiterates the guidance contained in the NPPF and PPG on Flood Risk and the Sequential Test. It is unnecessary to repeat national policy in the SWLP. The SWLP should simply direct the reader to the NPPF and PPG.

Yes

ID sylw: 97617

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Winter

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 97789

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

"new developments should be prioritised in areas of lowest floor risk...." SDC Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report April 2021 shows the area surrounding proposed site BW as RED ie. HIGH. Therefore, site BW is not appropriate for development

Yes

ID sylw: 97839

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brenda Stewart

no comment

Yes

ID sylw: 97861

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Stafford-scott

New development should be prioritised in areas of lowest flood risk. Using green field areas for urban developments increases flood risk and impacts the river water pollution due to runoff from highly fertilised land. Greg belt/brown field land should be prioritised over greenfield and farmland for development.

Yes

ID sylw: 97958

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Charlotte Careless

It should be looked at to see where there is flood risk. By building on Clopton quarter it would mean green belt land would be built on, and affecting flooding on Birmingham, what has got worse.

Yes

ID sylw: 98007

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Bowater

new developments should be chosen over in areas where flood risk is at its lowest. With flood risks due to get worse in the future avoiding those areas at most risk is obvious.

No

ID sylw: 98040

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barnabas Harrison

This is not sufficiently stringent, as SG24 appears to propose to construct infrastructure over land which is essential for flood management. Specifically, the SG24 area between Stratford Road, Aylesbury Road, Box Trees Road, and Grange Road, where the proposed development site would be over streams and a surface water sump (large, natural, ponds) which service much of the northern and eastern parts of Hockley Heath. The village and the A34 already experiences surface water flooding in even moderate rainfall; interfering with the area's hydrology in the proposed way is highly likely to result in many more properties being flooded.

No

ID sylw: 98107

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited

Asiant : Marrons

It is considered that the advice of Environment Agency should be applied in full to any policy relating to flood risk mitigation, rather than just partly applied as is the case with Draft Policy J.