BASE HEADER
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Biodiverse and Environmentally Resilient South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86149
Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie
N/A
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86961
Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming
-
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87111
Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025
Ymatebydd: S Gardner
Whilst I support this section, there needs to be more emphasis placed on the importance of green and active paces in developments and the conversion of areas to those of AOBs or protected spaces…
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87118
Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Steph Johnson
Broadly support.
However, do not support building on green belt in any circumstances.
More creative ways to compensate land owners should be invested in so that farmers and land owners don't just have to sell their land to developers to make money. They should be incentivised to create food for humans and animals. They should be incentivised for maintaining wild and bio-diverse spaces.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87619
Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025
Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris
I agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89116
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
i agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89166
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr nigel Freeth
we need to protect our green belt land to support the environment. any poor grade no agricultural land should be used to off set CO2 emissions & not built on
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89301
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Jon Knight
Broadly supportive, although given past experiences with developments I wonder how much of this will be held up against the need for development land. But I'd rather have these measures here and find them less effective than I'd like, than not have them at all.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89423
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Tim Twynam
Agree and Disagree with elements of the policy.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89762
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Compton Verney
n/a
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90034
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Fiona Macvie
.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91037
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Canal & River Trust
The Local Plan should seek to ensure that new development close to canals aims to protect and enhance their role as wildlife habitats through appropriate and sensitively designed landscape planting schemes and design of open spaces within developments. New development should seek to strengthen the role of canal corridors as part of the strategic green/blue infrastructure network, and particularly their value in providing a connection between other areas of green space.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91235
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council
‘Radford Semele Parish Council supports the overall thrust of the chapter on biodiversity and
environmental resilience but believes it should be strengthened. It should protect public
footpaths as linear open space. Areas of Restraint to avoid coalescence of settlements
should be protected from development. More emphasise should be placed on the
protection of productive Grade 3b agricultural land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91602
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson
I am concerned about how the Council will monitor some of these propsals and enforce them.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91728
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman
Sensible
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92280
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: SolStar Power Limited
Asiant : Enzygo
No further comments to what is provided under Draft Policy Direction 49.
Also have no comments for Draft Policy Direction 36-48.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92414
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Daphne Tilley
Yes but the plan affecting new settlement B1 will lose valuable farmland which plays a valuable part in achieving these aims. Therefore, the loss of at least three productive farms contradicts this policy so B1 sound not be put forward as a viable site
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92664
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson
No green belt land should be used
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93359
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ian Michael Hayes
Greenbelt land should remain greenbelt land. Development should be focussed on areas that are not protected in this way
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93628
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr JAMES STEWART
I agree with this policy because the best and most versatile agricultural land must be safeguarded for future food production. Protecting high-quality farmland ensures long-term agricultural sustainability, supporting local food supply and reducing reliance on imports. Once lost to development, this valuable land cannot be replaced, threatening future food security. Preserving it allows for continued farming, maintaining rural economies and environmental benefits. Sustainable planning must prioritize agricultural land protection to meet future needs while balancing development responsibly.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93755
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong
Yes, I welcome the strong ambition for biodiversity and environmental benefit.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93828
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwick District Green Party
We support the direction of travel implied in all the draft policy directions in this chapter. However, effective implementation will be challenging.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94347
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: phillip claydon
Policy must have teeth. Existing/future and local sites must be protected. Any mitigations for developments must be undertaken as close to site as possible.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94623
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Penny Gray
Just a couple of comments
1. I gather than the WWT's work on Local Nature Recovery Strategy hasn't been incorporated yet. It would be good to see this integrated.
2. Re DPD 49 on Agricultural land, some mention should surely be made re future food supply, given the increasing risk of future flooding andor drought and the need for adaptation.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95315
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council
yes - subject to acceptance of specific comments against individual questions
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95909
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr David Carter
The overall thrust of the chapter on biodiversity and environmental resilience should be strengthened. It should protect public footpaths as linear open space. Areas of Restraint to avoid coalescence of settlements should be protected from development. More emphasise should be placed on the protection of productive Grade 3b agricultural land.’
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95983
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh
Yes. See comments on11.3, 11.6, 11.7, 11.8, 11.11, 11.13 and 11.14.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 96079
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Wilson
It comes across as a sticking plaster over the building developments and solar panel maps of destruction of the landscape.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 96377
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council
Southam Town, District and County elected representatives broadly support these proposals subject to comment on Policy Direction 45.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 96498
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
See comments on Draft Policy Directions.
This needs to have much more focus in the future. Experience has shown that developers have little or no regard or developed responsibility for the environment they change forever.