BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction –39- Environmental Net Gain?
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95246
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council
Broadly agree but not entirely. Comments as lodged against DPD38 apply.
It would be no consolation for the community living next door to the appalling pollution from the waste site in Staffordshire if the operators were able to buy permits for another totally different and remote location thereby being allowed to carry on depositing waste.
(This example has an alternative connotation now that the site operator has entered financial liquidation)
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95345
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Lee Tallen
Surely a better solution would be addressing the cause of carbon emissions, i.e. number of cars in an area etc rather than putting a sticking plaster over it which 'carbon sequestration' feels like? Better public transport and incentives for people to use it would be more effective?
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95471
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Sue Cuff
It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95530
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Freeman
It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial
than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their
Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to inuence chosen
housing sites in the Local Plan.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95966
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh
Yes
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 96087
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Tamsin Kashap
No. It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 96127
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Rosemary Collier
It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 96362
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council
Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 96511
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
Words used seem to suggest this is a future intention.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 96627
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Nixon
Need to take in to account wider connecting corridors. Not isolate widlife in small area.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 96874
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery
The proposed development in site BW could not contribute positively to the natural environment which in this case consists of 329ha of agricultural land, hedges and trees. It is already a habitat for a variety of animals and plants as well as agricultural crops totally within the Green Belt.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 97077
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council
This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 97103
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: John Dinnie
Yes
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 97184
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Sir Thomas White’s Charity and The King Henry VIII Endowed Trust, Warwick
Asiant : Stansgate Planning
Whilst paragraph 187 of the Framework requires planning policies and decisions to contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment there is currently no requirement, or indeed reference, to Environmental Net Gain at a national level.
The Draft Policy Direction provides no justification for the inclusion of an ENG policy, nor any information about how such a policy would function in practice. There are no other examples of adopted Local Plan policies requiring ENG or any well-developed metric for measuring ENG. It is likely to harm viability, duplicate BNG requirements, cause longer lead-in times and the uncertainty could delay the deliverability of sites. As such this policy direction should be removed from the emerging Plan.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 97212
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council
Yes
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 97409
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Godwin Developments
Godwin Developments note the policy direction suggested in Direct Policy 39 however it is strongly advised that further work in undertaken to justify the inclusion of such a policy. Whilst it is acknowledged that there is supportive text within the NPPF (Para 187) it is also noted that this is an emerging area of policy which has limited coverage in other local plans.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 97455
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr David Turner
You aim to have a policy of environmental net gain, without any commitment. Not good enough!
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 97738
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery
Such a policy is fine but development on site BW of 6700 houses cannot contribute positively to the natural environment consisting of open fields, hedges and trees.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 97932
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Brenda Stewart
no comment
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 98411
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Newbould
na
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 98510
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy Flynn
Asiant : Stansgate Planning
Whilst paragraph 187 of the Framework requires planning policies and decisions to contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment there is currently no requirement, or indeed reference, to Environmental Net Gain at a national level.
The Draft Policy Direction provides no justification for the inclusion of an ENG policy, nor any information about how such a policy would function in practice. There are no other examples of adopted Local Plan policies requiring ENG or any well-developed metric for measuring ENG. It is likely to harm viability, duplicate BNG requirements, cause longer lead-in times and the uncertainty could delay the deliverability of sites. As such this policy direction should be removed from the emerging Plan.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 98695
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Ginny White
I don't think Policy 39 goes far enough. Our wildlife is under huge pressure already and the proposed small scale on-site improvements are not enough to provide the wider ranging connecting corridors to support and nurture local species. I would like to see the Green/Blue infrastructure evidence base updated in line with the NPPF in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 98975
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Cotswold District Council
Support - will you also consider soils as the ENG framework is developed.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 99129
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr James Kennedy
This emerging policy feels like work in early progress. Research needs to be done on other authorities that have introduced similar policies. It will be important to avoid overlap with DPD 38 (BNG) so as not to increase the burden on developers through duplication. A clear definition of how ENG goes above and beyond BNG is important as is how ENG will be measured.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 99664
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham
yes
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 99740
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Stone -Johnston
While Environmental Net Gain (ENG) expands the scope beyond biodiversity, its effectiveness remains questionable. The holistic approach, though comprehensive, risks oversimplifying the complexities of ecosystems by focusing on broad metrics like air and water quality without fully addressing the root causes of environmental degradation. In practice, these broad measures may fail to produce meaningful improvements in local ecosystems, particularly in the short term. Additionally, ENG’s reliance on carbon sequestration as a starting point can overshadow more pressing concerns, such as habitat destruction and species loss, which need urgent attention before long-term solutions can be fully realized.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 99931
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Simpson
It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 99949
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Coulsting
I believe the Draft Policy Direction –39- Environmental Net Gain is a postive policy
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 100421
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Adrian Parsons
I absolutely agree with the approach laid out
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 100477
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott
Carbon sequestration is not the answer to increased carbon footprint. Improving access to public transport and building the infrastructure for rail and other alternatives must be considered.