BASE HEADER

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction –39- Environmental Net Gain?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 61 i 90 o 162

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95246

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Broadly agree but not entirely. Comments as lodged against DPD38 apply.
It would be no consolation for the community living next door to the appalling pollution from the waste site in Staffordshire if the operators were able to buy permits for another totally different and remote location thereby being allowed to carry on depositing waste.
(This example has an alternative connotation now that the site operator has entered financial liquidation)

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95345

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Lee Tallen

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Surely a better solution would be addressing the cause of carbon emissions, i.e. number of cars in an area etc rather than putting a sticking plaster over it which 'carbon sequestration' feels like? Better public transport and incentives for people to use it would be more effective?

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95471

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sue Cuff

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95530

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Freeman

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial
than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their
Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to inuence chosen
housing sites in the Local Plan.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 95966

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96087

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Tamsin Kashap

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No. It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96127

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rosemary Collier

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96362

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96511

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Words used seem to suggest this is a future intention.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96627

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Nixon

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Need to take in to account wider connecting corridors. Not isolate widlife in small area.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 96874

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposed development in site BW could not contribute positively to the natural environment which in this case consists of 329ha of agricultural land, hedges and trees. It is already a habitat for a variety of animals and plants as well as agricultural crops totally within the Green Belt.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97077

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97103

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97184

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sir Thomas White’s Charity and The King Henry VIII Endowed Trust, Warwick

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Whilst paragraph 187 of the Framework requires planning policies and decisions to contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment there is currently no requirement, or indeed reference, to Environmental Net Gain at a national level.
The Draft Policy Direction provides no justification for the inclusion of an ENG policy, nor any information about how such a policy would function in practice. There are no other examples of adopted Local Plan policies requiring ENG or any well-developed metric for measuring ENG. It is likely to harm viability, duplicate BNG requirements, cause longer lead-in times and the uncertainty could delay the deliverability of sites. As such this policy direction should be removed from the emerging Plan.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97212

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97409

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Godwin Developments

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Godwin Developments note the policy direction suggested in Direct Policy 39 however it is strongly advised that further work in undertaken to justify the inclusion of such a policy. Whilst it is acknowledged that there is supportive text within the NPPF (Para 187) it is also noted that this is an emerging area of policy which has limited coverage in other local plans.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97455

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Turner

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

You aim to have a policy of environmental net gain, without any commitment. Not good enough!

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97738

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Such a policy is fine but development on site BW of 6700 houses cannot contribute positively to the natural environment consisting of open fields, hedges and trees.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 97932

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brenda Stewart

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

no comment

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98411

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Newbould

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

na

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98510

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy Flynn

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Whilst paragraph 187 of the Framework requires planning policies and decisions to contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment there is currently no requirement, or indeed reference, to Environmental Net Gain at a national level.
The Draft Policy Direction provides no justification for the inclusion of an ENG policy, nor any information about how such a policy would function in practice. There are no other examples of adopted Local Plan policies requiring ENG or any well-developed metric for measuring ENG. It is likely to harm viability, duplicate BNG requirements, cause longer lead-in times and the uncertainty could delay the deliverability of sites. As such this policy direction should be removed from the emerging Plan.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98695

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ginny White

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I don't think Policy 39 goes far enough. Our wildlife is under huge pressure already and the proposed small scale on-site improvements are not enough to provide the wider ranging connecting corridors to support and nurture local species. I would like to see the Green/Blue infrastructure evidence base updated in line with the NPPF in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 98975

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cotswold District Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support - will you also consider soils as the ENG framework is developed.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99129

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Kennedy

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This emerging policy feels like work in early progress. Research needs to be done on other authorities that have introduced similar policies. It will be important to avoid overlap with DPD 38 (BNG) so as not to increase the burden on developers through duplication. A clear definition of how ENG goes above and beyond BNG is important as is how ENG will be measured.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99664

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

yes

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99740

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Stone -Johnston

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

While Environmental Net Gain (ENG) expands the scope beyond biodiversity, its effectiveness remains questionable. The holistic approach, though comprehensive, risks oversimplifying the complexities of ecosystems by focusing on broad metrics like air and water quality without fully addressing the root causes of environmental degradation. In practice, these broad measures may fail to produce meaningful improvements in local ecosystems, particularly in the short term. Additionally, ENG’s reliance on carbon sequestration as a starting point can overshadow more pressing concerns, such as habitat destruction and species loss, which need urgent attention before long-term solutions can be fully realized.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99931

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Simpson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is unclear how this will deliver wider connecting corridors which are more substantial than the proposed small scale on-site improvements. The councils should update their Green/Blue Infrastructure evidence base, in line with the NPPF and in time to influence chosen housing sites in the Local Plan.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 99949

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Coulsting

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I believe the Draft Policy Direction –39- Environmental Net Gain is a postive policy

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100421

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adrian Parsons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I absolutely agree with the approach laid out

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 100477

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Carbon sequestration is not the answer to increased carbon footprint. Improving access to public transport and building the infrastructure for rail and other alternatives must be considered.