No

Whilst the key principles are sound there is no mention of prioritising developments that actually also ensure the protection of the most vulnerable green belt land between conurbations to both prevent urban sprawl and the loss of community identities. A recognition that major infrastructure schemes currently in progress ie. HS2 should also not lead to the redefinition of green space boundaries. Links to current reviews 'MasterPlan' focusing on South Coventry. On behalf Cubbington Parish Council

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

Strongly support the development of brownfield sites over green belt. Cubbington Neighbourhood Plan survey results • 99% wanted open spaces preserved. and a significant majority wanted to protect existing nature, environment and open land, and landscape views. With potential pressures ie. in-fill post HS2 between Cubbington and new railway line, there is need to protect the natural environment and protect what is left of the green belt buffer and landscape views. Brownfield development should also reduce traffic, noise and air pollution when situated next to amenities, schools, etc. On behalf Cubbington Parish Council

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

Yes

Yes

Ni roddwyd ateb

Yes

Ni roddwyd ateb

Yes

Yes

Major new settlements should not be in green belt and definitely focused on long term sustainability (infrastructure, cleaner transport- trains, local employment). This strategy can also protect the green belt between North Leamington and Coventry, comply with the majority of people's view on green belt protection and avoid overburdening existing communities and services if a policy growth villages expansion or dispersed developments were encouraged. On behalf of Cubbington Parish Council

Appropriate strategy

Appropriate strategy

Neutral

Neutral

Inappropriate strategy

Appropriate strategy

Appropriate strategy

Appropriate strategy

Appropriate strategy

Inappropriate strategy