dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

The Issues and Options document does not make it clear how the various strands it considers will be drawn together to ensure a coherent and effective economic strategy for South Warwickshire is delivered. This must be remedied in future drafts of the emerging Plan. As expressed elsewhere in these representations the evidence base inadequately expresses the need for economic development for reasons including that it does not address suppressed demand. There is some disconnect between the Spatial Growth Options, the treatment of Major Investment Sites, and the concept of the Core Opportunity Area. This is compounded by a lack of clarity around Green Belt review, and some apparent misunderstanding of how major extant permissions relate to the Green Belt. In part this is a function of the Issues and Options process which is necessarily exploratory in its nature. However, to some extent this does act to prevent a clear narrative being established in representations about the direction consultees wish the Plan to take. For clarity, it is CAL’s position that the Airport should be included as a Major Investment Site. Specific policy support should be provided for development and growth there. This should feed in to a Spatial Growth Option supportive of the economy whilst also encouraging sustainable transport, which in turn dovetails with promotion of the Core Opportunity Area. This should also include removal of the Airport from the Green Belt. Its continued Green Belt status is an anomaly, it performs no meaningful Green Belt function, and this only serves to undermine the very great potential of this site to accommodate growth and contribute significantly to meeting South Warwickshire’s development needs.

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

Ni roddwyd ateb

Ni roddwyd ateb

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

A formal requirement for a Climate Change Risk Assessment is unnecessary. Proper application of other policies, e.g., in relation to sustainability requirements and design standards, alongside compliance with building standards, should be sufficient and an additional administrative burden should be avoided.

Yes

Ni roddwyd ateb

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd