Issue and Options 2023

Chwilio am ymatebion i ffurflenni

Canlyniadau chwilio Alcester Town Council

ID Ffurflen: 74568

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Q-E1.1: Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of employment need across South Warwickshire?

Don't know

Q-E1.2: If your answer to E-1.1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future employment needs for this Local Plan?

Ni roddwyd ateb

ID Ffurflen: 74569

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

dewiswyd

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 74571

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Appropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

ID Ffurflen: 74572

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

Ni roddwyd ateb

ID Ffurflen: 74573

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

Ni roddwyd ateb

ID Ffurflen: 74574

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Option S3.2a: Prioritise brownfield development only when it corresponds with the identified growth strategy, or if it can be proven that the development is in a sustainable location or would increase the sustainability of the area.

dewiswyd

Option S3.2b: Prioritise development on brownfield land, incorporating existing buildings into development proposals wherever possible, irrespective of its location

dewiswyd

Option S3.2c: None of these

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 74575

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Q-S3.1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Urban Capacity Study

Support brownfield first

ID Ffurflen: 74576

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Option S2a: Identify areas considered particularly suited to intensification development, and develop a design code for each character area. Have a policy supporting intensification within these identified areas where it complies with the relevant design code.

dewiswyd

Option S2b: Have a policy with 'in principle' support for intensification development, applicable across South Warwickshire; and develop design codes

dewiswyd

Option S2c: Do not have a policy which encourages intensification

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 74577

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

dewiswyd

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 74578

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Q-I5: Please add any comments you wish to make about infrastructure, viability and deliverability

Important to have the grand plan plus the ability to deliver financially- we don't want a repeat of Long Marston and the South West Relief Road.

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut I ddefnyddio’r system ac I wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.