Issue and Options 2023

Chwilio am ymatebion i ffurflenni

Canlyniadau chwilio Radford Semele Parish Council

ID Ffurflen: 74901

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

Ni roddwyd ateb

ID Ffurflen: 74903

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Q-S7.1: Please provide any comments you have on the emissions estimation modelling for the five growth options

The lowest total emissions for the plan period is option 3 - Economy

ID Ffurflen: 74904

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Inappropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Inappropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Neutral

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

ID Ffurflen: 74905

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

ID Ffurflen: 74906

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

dewiswyd

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 74907

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

We agree with the consideration of development of areas within existing green belt, to rebalance the distribution throughout areas of South Warwickshire.

ID Ffurflen: 74909

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Option E2a: Include a policy which encourages businesses to be low carbon

dewiswyd

Option E2b: Do not include a policy encouraging businesses to be low carbon

dewiswyd

Option E2c: Include a policy which looks to identify sites or development zones which are targeted at businesses wishing to be innovative towards a low carbon economy.

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 74938

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Option E6a: Include a policy which protects South Warwickshire's economic assets.

dewiswyd

Option E6b: Do not include a policy protecting all these economic assets

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 74945

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Option E7.1a: Include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

dewiswyd

Option E7.1b: Do not include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

dewiswyd

Option E7.2a: Include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

dewiswyd

Option E7.2b: Do not include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 74948

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Q-E8.1: Do you agree that the existing employment allocations, including the revisions to Atherstone Airfield, should be carried over into the SWLP?

Yes

Q-E8.2: If, no please list the sites that should be excluded and give reasons.

Ni roddwyd ateb

Q-E8.3: Do you agree that proposals seeking the loss of a business, commercial or community building or facility should be subject to marketing, viability and alternative use tests?

Yes

Q-E8.4: Pease specify what you consider to be appropriate tests

Ni roddwyd ateb

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut i ddefnyddio’r system ac i wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.