Issue and Options 2023

Chwilio am ymatebion i ffurflenni

Canlyniadau chwilio Shipston on Stour Town Council

ID Ffurflen: 75239

Ymatebydd: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

The 20 minute neighbourhood is a flawed concept. Shipston on Stour can never meet this criterion in large areas of the Parish, following the last five years of new development. It obviously is not s concept that can be 'retro-fitted'.

ID Ffurflen: 75240

Ymatebydd: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

Ni roddwyd ateb

ID Ffurflen: 75241

Ymatebydd: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-S7.1: Please provide any comments you have on the emissions estimation modelling for the five growth options

None. Too far in the future.

ID Ffurflen: 75242

Ymatebydd: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Neutral

Option 3: Economy

Neutral

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Neutral

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

ID Ffurflen: 75243

Ymatebydd: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A lower limit is appropriate

ID Ffurflen: 75244

Ymatebydd: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

dewiswyd

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 75245

Ymatebydd: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

No account of the inadequacy of existing infrastructure to support the dwellings that have already been built. Many of these received planning assent before the Core Strategy was approved or even developed, therefore were not subject to any spatial considerations. Existing infrastructure shortfall needs to be addressed.

ID Ffurflen: 75246

Ymatebydd: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Q-E1.1: Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of employment need across South Warwickshire?

Q-E1.2: If your answer to E-1.1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future employment needs for this Local Plan?

Ni roddwyd ateb

ID Ffurflen: 75247

Ymatebydd: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Option E2a: Include a policy which encourages businesses to be low carbon

dewiswyd

Option E2b: Do not include a policy encouraging businesses to be low carbon

dewiswyd

Option E2c: Include a policy which looks to identify sites or development zones which are targeted at businesses wishing to be innovative towards a low carbon economy.

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 75248

Ymatebydd: Shipston on Stour Town Council

Option E3a: Include a policy expanding on SDC's current existing policy.

dewiswyd

Option E3b: Have separate policies for individual sectors.

dewiswyd

Option E3c: Include a policy that secures employment strategies through S106.

dewiswyd

Option E3d: None of these

dewiswyd

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut I ddefnyddio’r system ac I wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.