BASE HEADER
Issue and Options 2023
Chwilio am ymatebion i ffurflenni
Canlyniadau chwilio Beaudesert & Henley in Arden Joint Parish Council
Chwilio o’r newyddThe JPC strongly endorses proposals to protect and enhance the historic and environmental quality of the town and the steps to be taken by the partnership to achieve that. This level of proposal, however, appears to JPC to be far too detailed and is an example of excessive scope/detail in the consultation. These are all issues that are being delegated to NPs and there needs to be some reference in the document to encouraging Neighbourhood Plans to undertake this activity and guidance as to appropriate approaches.
Q-W1: This is a national and regional issue Q-W2: The JPC does not support work on this as it is inappropriate for a sub-regional plan
Ni roddwyd ateb
The JPC supports the items highlighted but is extremely concerned about the status of this section. The JPC considers that the transport section as the single biggest criterion in choosing preferred options should have had a significant larger part of the consultation. It seems to be buried among the later sections which have less immediate impact on local communities .This should be treated as an infrastructure issue There should be a much more significant discussion about the rail and bus services to the subregion including an assessment of the quality of the services and how improvements in those services can be realigned. As mentioned above there are no road proposals affecting Henley in Arden in the document and there are no discussions about the improvements to the rail and bus services to the town.
Q-B1: The JPC strongly endorses option B1a and proposals to protect and enhance the historic and environmental quality of the town and the steps to be taken by the partnership to achieve that. This level of proposal, however, appears to JPC to be far too detailed and is an example of excessive scope/detail in this consultation. These are all issues that are being delegated to NPs and there needs to be some reference in the document to encouraging Neighbourhood Plans to undertake this activity and guidance as to appropriate approaches. Q-B2: This is a matter for the local councils and their residents Q-B4: The JPC believes that in general our environmental quality needs to be protected and maintained and although the ideas are sound this might have a negative impact on areas to the North depending on the scale of the buffer. However, these are issues to be debated with local communities and the relevant statutory agencies involved and the Local Plan part 1 does not seem to be the correct place to have this debate. Q-B5: The JPC supports option 5a. The core idea is sound, but we have concerns that this might push more development further to the North. Q-B9: The JPC supports the proposal, but it still seems doubtful that the duplication is essential at this stage.
