Wherever possible ensure opportunities for sustainable and active travel are baked into plans

Yes

Yes

Ni roddwyd ateb

Appropriate strategy

Dim byd wedi’i ddewis

Dim byd wedi’i ddewis

Dim byd wedi’i ddewis

Dim byd wedi’i ddewis

Yes

Dim byd wedi’i ddewis

Q-S8.2: suggest we need some evidence base for the number Q-S10: Need to take action now

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

Dim byd wedi’i ddewis

But important to give consideration, in Stratford Upon Avon in particular, that the risk of poor infrastruture not being suficient to support a growing population may mean a reduction in visitors to stratford upon avon and therefore less available jobs in the town.

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

Q-E2: E2a. Yes with prioritisation for thiose who are more sustainable, but also E2c which mitigates E2b Q-E3: E3b is too restrictive, this should be left to an open market economy Q-E6: Agree with E6a but has to be a fluid policy on a case by case basis as the economic demands change Q-E9: Very hard one to answer and we may have a clearer view in the next round. Option E9a feels least restrictive at this pointand certainly taking a holsitic view of retail across the district can't be a bad thing. Q-E10: With regard to QE10, we disagree with the premise that tourism is unaffected by spatial planning. There are key issues to be addressed around infrastructure in and around areas of development that not only supports its residents but those visiting the area. The imapct that these developments and associated economic plans will have a direct impact on workforce that feed the tourism sector.

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd