Issue and Options 2023

Yn ôl at y ddogfen

Chwilio am ymatebion i ffurflenni

Canlyniadau chwilio Burton Green Parish Council

Chwilio o’r newydd

ID Ffurflen: 75412

Ymatebydd: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-I4.1: Should we include a policy to safeguard specific infrastructure schemes within the SWLP?

Yes

Q-I4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about these specific safeguarding provisions

Whilst the Council agrees that there should be a policy, land within the Green Belt should NOT be safeguarded for future infrastructure schemes.

ID Ffurflen: 75413

Ymatebydd: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-I5: Please add any comments you wish to make about infrastructure, viability and deliverability

Burton Green Parish Council supports the need for the development strategy of South Warwickshire to be both deliverable and viable.

ID Ffurflen: 75414

Ymatebydd: Burton Green Parish Council

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

dewiswyd

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 75420

Ymatebydd: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

Ni roddwyd ateb

ID Ffurflen: 75421

Ymatebydd: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

Ni roddwyd ateb

ID Ffurflen: 75422

Ymatebydd: Burton Green Parish Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Appropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

ID Ffurflen: 75423

Ymatebydd: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A lower limit is appropriate

ID Ffurflen: 75425

Ymatebydd: Burton Green Parish Council

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

dewiswyd

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 75427

Ymatebydd: Burton Green Parish Council

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

The HS2 route should not be considered a railway corridor as it does not serves South Warwickshire; land in this corridor should not be seen area of potential spatial growth

ID Ffurflen: 75428

Ymatebydd: Burton Green Parish Council

Option E4.1a: Include a policy supporting diversification

dewiswyd

Option E4.1b: Do not include a specific policy on diversification

dewiswyd

Option E4.2a: Include a policy supporting small-scale employment opportunities in rural areas

dewiswyd

Option E4.2b: Do not include a policy supporting small-scale employment opportunities in rural areas

dewiswyd

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut I ddefnyddio’r system ac I wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.