Issue and Options 2023

Yn ôl at y ddogfen

Chwilio am ymatebion i ffurflenni

Canlyniadau chwilio Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Chwilio o’r newydd

ID Ffurflen: 77856

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Option W2a: Include a policy on Health Impact Assessments

dewiswyd

Option W2b: Do not include a policy on Health Impact Assessments

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 77858

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Option B5a: Explore and pursue an integrated Environmental Net Gain Policy

dewiswyd

Option B5b: Explore environmental net gain through separate policies

dewiswyd

Option B5c: None of these

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 77859

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Q-B9: Should the plan include a policy requiring the safeguarding of sites of national importance, sites of local importance, and other non-designated sites known to make a positive contribution to biodiversity or geodiversity; unless the benefits of the proposal clearly outweigh the need to protect the site. Where possible conserve and enhance these sites.

Yes

Q-B10: Please add any comments you wish to make about a biodiverse and environmentally resilient South Warwickshire

Ni roddwyd ateb

ID Ffurflen: 77863

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Q-P1.1: Do you agree with the proposed broad content of the Part 1 plan?

Q-P1.2: If no, please indicate why

Flooding is a strategic issue and should be included in Part 1. Development of SUDs for new schemes should be included from the outset of any plans, and by putting this into part 2 it gives the wrong signals to developers.

ID Ffurflen: 77864

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Q-P1.3: Do you agree with the selection of policies to be addressed in the Part 1 plan?

Q-P1.4: If not, please indicate why

I believe that FW2, Sustainable Drainage, should be included in Part 1. Sustainable drainage is best addressed at the initial design phase of any development to be most effective. By only including this in Part 2, it does not encourage developers to give this the priority that it requires. I consider that this IS a strategic issue.

ID Ffurflen: 77865

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Option W3a: Include an overall policy on health

dewiswyd

Option W3b: Do not include a policy on health

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 77866

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

dewiswyd

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 77867

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Option I3a: Establish a South Warwickshire CIL (or emerging new Infrastructure Levy) to support the delivery of the Plan

dewiswyd

Option I3b: Each District Council to produce its own Levy

dewiswyd

ID Ffurflen: 83723

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Q-I1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Sustainability Appraisal, indicating clearly which element of the appraisal you are commenting on.

Issue I1 - I do not feel that the sustainability appraisal goes far enough, as the flood impact assessment only includes the impact of flooding at new sites, it does not address the impact of flooding from new development at other sites. This is particularly concerning since several of the proposed development areas are in the watershed of the Finham Brook, which already causes issues with flooding locally.

ID Ffurflen: 83724

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Q-S7.1: Please provide any comments you have on the emissions estimation modelling for the five growth options

Issue S7.1 - see comments above [Issue I1]. I do not agree with the conclusion that none of the proposed sites have any issues with flooding.

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut I ddefnyddio’r system ac I wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.