BASE HEADER

Preferred Options 2025

Chwilio sylwadau

Canlyniadau chwilio Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Chwilio o’r newydd Chwilio o’r newydd

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

ID sylw: 108560

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Vision

Five overarching principles for the plan which are pursuant to the vision are listed. Notably, these do not fully align with the draft vision, and this must be addressed. Indeed, none of the principles refer to the delivery of “homes and įobs”, despite the provision of new housing and economic growth being key to the achievement of sustainable development, as highlighted in Paragraph 8 of the NPPF. In order to ensure that the vision and its five principles are positively prepared and consistent with national policy, which emphasises the importance of planning to meet an area’s objectively assessed needs, it is imperative for reference to be made to this, to then feed into the Strategic Objectives which follow. These do reference housing and employment (SO 1, 2, and 4), but have no direct link to the five principles as drafted.

The selected spatial growth strategy, ‘Sustainable Travel and Economy’, should also be referred to, and woven into the other principles, as this strategy is now a fundamental part of the SWLP and the vision for South Warwickshire, which will shape the strategic objectives and policies in the plan.

The vision and first of the five principles place a significant emphasis on responding to the climate emergency. Although this is supported in general, it is important that this does not dominate the Vision and Strategic Objectives of the SWLP to the detriment of delivering a balanced, sustainable strategy which achieves the delivery of development to meet identified needs.
The second principle refers to creating a “beautiful” South Warwickshire. Whilst this aspiration is supported, and there is some reference to “beauty” within national policy, including in Paragraph 131 of the NPPF, there is concern that this is poorly defined and will need to be supported by more detailed guidance on what beauty means in practice.

Strategic Objectives

The twelve Strategic Objectives are comprehensive, covering the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development set out in Paragraph 8 of the NPPF. It is thus considered that they are consistent with national policy.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?

ID sylw: 108561

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

a) Housing Numbers

It is considered that the policy direction as drafted is not positively prepared, justified, or consistent with national policy, in relying on out-of-date evidence to suggest that 1,679 dpa would be an acceptable annual housing requirement, and incorrectly treating the Standard Method’s 2,188 dpa as a maximum figure, secondary to the ageing HEDNA. To remedy this, the emerging policy should state that provision will be made for at least 2,188 dpa, requiring a minimum of 54,700 dwellings over the plan period. The evidence demonstrates that this is deliverable, with in excess of 2,188 completions in six of the last eight years across South Warwickshire, and opting for this higher figure would not undermine the effectiveness of the plan. Notwithstanding, planning for an even greater number of homes is encouraged and would be strongly supported, to provide sufficient flexibility to allow for higher-growth scenarios as set out in the Further Advice on Housing & Employment Land Needs report (up to 2,808 dpa), unmet need from neighbouring authorities, potential uncertainty in the number of dwellings which will be delivered on windfall sites, and the delivery of sufficient affordable homes to meet local need (from 2,772 dpa - discussed further under Policy Direction 10). Such an approach would ensure that the objectively assessed housing need for South Warwickshire can be met in full. This is supported by the SA, which concludes that providing at least 2,188 dpa will have the most positive effects compared to the reasonable alternatives in terms of housing and supporting economic growth. Planning for this number of homes will align with the aspirations of the NPPF, including those set out in Paragraphs 61 and 83.

b) Housing Land Supply

The updated Standard Method has significantly increased the annual housing requirement within Stratford, from 553 dpa to 1,126 dpa (a 103.6% increase). The latest analysis indicates a housing supply of just 3.11 years for Stratford.

In an appeal decision related to the Warwickshire Police Headquarters in Long Wootton (ref. APP/T3725/W/23/3319752), dated 24 May 2024, the Inspector determined that Warwick only had a 4.01-year land supply, and a shortfall of 665 dwellings. The appeal decision clarified that Warwick should be assuming a 45% discount on their supply which is to meet Coventry’s needs, based on the spatial strategy of the adopted Warwick District Local Plan. Taking that position into account, the Inspector concluded that Warwick’s supply was 4,914 dwellings. Under the new Standard Method’s minimum local housing need (1,062 dpa), based on a five-year supply of 4,914 dwellings, Warwick only has a 4.40-year housing land supply at the present time.

c) Spatial Growth Strategy

There is insufficient previously developed land within South Warwickshire to accommodate the level of housing required.

The Councils clearly have an opportunity to allocate additional sites which will deliver housing that extends beyond the minimum local need, to absorb any unmet needs from neighbouring authorities, in line with Paragraphs 24 and 62 of the NPPF, allow for higher- growth scenarios, deliver enough affordable homes, and provide flexibility to avoid potential future shortfalls in delivery.

It is contended that the SA undervalues the positive contribution that residential development in South Warwickshire can make towards biodiversity, particularly if sites are currently in arable use, as such land generally has a low ecological value.

The proposed housing allocation of land north of Harbury Depot will form a natural extension to the existing development and the wider settlement. The Site will benefit from enhanced connectivity via a new pedestrian link from the Site through the BDW development and Nature Reserve to the south leading directly to the centre of Bishops Itchington, with a range of services and facilities, as well as Bishops Itchington Primary School. The proposed housing allocation will also offer the opportunity to deliver a small local centre, as well as enhanced recreational and open space provision to further compliment this existing provision.
The Site’s sustainable location, in addition to its close proximity to the major employment centre (and proposed employment expansion) at Gaydon/Lighthorne Heath aligns with the Strategic Growth Strategy for the Plan of ‘Sustainable Travel and Economy’. The Site should therefore be positively considered as a location for growth, related to a recognition of the roles that Bishops Itchington and nearby Harbury play as sustainable settlements.

As currently shown, the defined Priority Area 3 at Bishop’s Itchington would potentially preclude the delivery of a high quality sustainable development for circa 220 new homes, despite aligning with the Plan’s Spatial Growth Strategy. The Priority Area for Bishops Itchington should therefore be revisited ensuring the development of this Site can come forward in line with the proposed policies of this Plan.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?

ID sylw: 108562

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is recognised that new settlements can make an important contribution towards meeting South Warwickshire’s housing requirement and this approach would be consistent with national policy (with Paragraph 77 stating that the supply of large numbers of new homes can often be best achieved through planning for new settlements), this must be balanced alongside the delivery of a range of sites throughout the Plan period.

New settlements have long lead-in times, which means that their contribution towards South Warwickshire’s housing supply would likely be in the latter part of the plan period, and possibly into the next. If too much of the supply depends on a new settlement, and delays arise in its delivery, the Councils risk significantly underdelivering housing. Therefore, it will be critical for the Councils to allocate a range of other sites across the Strategic Growth Locations, and these should form the majority of South Warwickshire’s housing supply, in addition to any new settlement(s).

To the east of this Site, beyond the railway line, the Council identifies Land south of Deppers Bridge as a potential new settlement (New Settlement F2), with a capacity of 4,840 new homes. Whilst not identified as one of the preferred Settlements, directing growth within this broader location was clearly considered to be a reasonable alternative when assessing suitable growth locations. This highlights further the inconsistent approach taken by the Council’s in relation to the Priority Areas, and in particular with regards to Bishops Itchington settlement and this Site. As with the BDW housing development to the south, this Site has the ability to be brought forward within the next 5 years with no constraints to development, contributing further to the sustainability credentials of the wider settlement.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?

ID sylw: 108563

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This Policy Direction, in encouraging small-scale development, is generally supported; Paragraph 73 of the NPPF is clear that small-to-medium sized sites can make an important contribution towards an area’s housing supply, and opportunities should be sought to support small sites being brought forward. It is stated that the existing settlement boundaries will be reviewed, and this is encouraged by Persimmon.

The fact that the Councils will support small-scale development adįacent to settlement boundaries is welcomed, since these can be amongst the most sustainable locations for housing. Going forward, it will be important to define “small-scale”.
Villages should be afforded more growth where this would not have adverse sustainability implications.

The Policy Direction suggests that very limited development will be allowed within and adjacent to settlements in the Green Belt. In order to be consistent with the latest national policy, it is recommended that reference should be made to ‘grey belt’ land.

The settlement boundary for Bishop’s Itchington should be revisited to include this existing development, along with this Site which forms a natural extension to the settlement, enclosed by existing physical boundaries.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?

ID sylw: 108564

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Paragraph 24 of the NPPF sets out the duty to cooperate, and Paragraph 36 is clear that for a plan to be positively prepared, unmet need from neighbouring areas must be accommodated where possible. Stratford forms part of the Greater Birmingham and Black Country Housing Market Area (GBBCHMA) and both Stratford and Warwick are in the Coventry and Warwickshire Housing Market Area. The latest position on housing need in the GBBCHMA is dated July 2020; this identified an unmet need of 40,325 dwellings, and a shortfall of 29,260 dwellings post-2031 in the Black Country alone. More recently, in the Birmingham Local Plan Review Preferred Options consultation document (July 2024), a shortfall of 46,153 dwellings over the period 2020 – 2042 was identified, with paragraph 3.5 stating that “the city will continue to be reliant on other local authorities to assist in meeting Birmingham's housing shortfall”. The evidence on shortfalls in the HMAs is out-of-date and should be refreshed as a matter of priority. To deliver the housing the HMAs require will necessitate a clear delineation of responsibility under the duty to cooperate to address any shortfalls, including through the SWLP Part 1.

In anticipation of there being significant shortfalls, in light of the scale of the previously evidenced shortfalls and the fact that various authorities in the HMAs have experienced significant increases in their housing requirements arising from the revised Standard Method, the Councils are encouraged to plan appropriately and allocate (reserve) sites for this purpose. It is considered that there is sufficient developable land in the large area of South Warwickshire to do so, as identified in the Strategic Growth Locations and potential new settlements, which can accommodate a significantly greater number of units than is required to meet Stratford and Warwick’s own needs. The Councils have a legal duty to cooperate and a responsibility to help address unmet needs, and for the SWLP Part 1 to be found sound, it is expected that it will need to do so.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?

ID sylw: 108565

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The provision of appropriate infrastructure is supported in principle. In Stratford and Warwick, developer contributions can be secured via the Community Infrastructure Levy and Section 106 Agreements. The SWLP Part 1 should clearly define and distinguish between the two; developers should not be required to contribute towards the same items through each. In addition, the SWLP Part 1 should make it explicitly clear, including in relation to education contributions, that only proportionate infrastructure can be sought in line with the needs generated by a development – contributions must not extend beyond this to remedy any existing deficiencies which may exist in South Warwickshire. Indeed,

The emerging Policy Direction makes no reference to viability considerations. It suggests that “all development must provide appropriate on- and off-site infrastructure” (emphasis added), despite the fact that this may render a scheme unviable. The SA has not recognised the adverse impacts this omission could have on SA Objectives 9 (Housing) and 11 (Economy). Paragraph 35 of the NPPF is clear that whilst plans should set out the contributions and infrastructure expected from development, such policies should not undermine the deliverability of the plan. The Councils must undertake a viability assessment as part of the plan-making process, in line with the National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG), to ensure that contributions for infrastructure would not undermine the viability of development on allocated sites. The policy should acknowledge that applicants may demonstrate whether particular circumstances justify the need for a viability assessment at the application stage.

Notwithstanding, sites such as that of land north of Harbury Depot have the ability, alongside the delivery of much needed new homes, to deliver enhanced infrastructure provision for the benefit of existing communities.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?

ID sylw: 108566

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The Councils are proposing to carry forward the existing safeguarding measures for schemes which are yet to be completed. Paragraph 111(c) of the NPPF does state that planning policies should identify and protect sites and routes which could be critical in developing infrastructure to widen transport choice. However, the NPPF is also clear, in the same paragraph, that policies should only seek to do this where there is robust evidence to justify it, and the Councils acknowledge, in the supporting justification for the policy direction, that such evidence is still emerging, and further work is required in this respect. It will be necessary for the policy and safeguarding of land to be underpinned by appropriate evidence, to ensure that this is justified and sound, as per Paragraph 36 of the NPPF.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?

ID sylw: 108567

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There are a range of densities throughout South Warwickshire, as highlighted in the Guide to Existing Housing Densities Topic Paper (January 2023), ranging from 6 dph in Alveston to 113 dph in central Leamington Spa. The Policy Direction is broadly supported as it recognises that a flexible approach to density should be taken. The NPPF emphasises the importance of achieving densities which are appropriate to the character of the area within which sites are located, with Paragraph 130 stating that a range of densities should be set out in policy to reflect the accessibility and potential of different areas. Such an approach would be consistent with national policy and justified, since the evidence base highlights the existing varying densities, and the need to consider the unique character of areas, some of which will be better suited to densification.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 9 - Using Brownfield Land for Development?

ID sylw: 108569

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

In encouraging the use of previously developed land, this Policy Direction aligns with national policy, with Paragraph 124 emphasing that as much use as possible should be made of brownfield sites. However, as discussed above, the Urban Capacity Study has already established that there is insufficient brownfield land available within settlements to meet South Warwickshire’s development needs. Whilst there are other brownfield sites located elsewhere in Stratford and Warwick, outside of settlement boundaries, the Urban Capacity Study is still clear that “significant greenfield development” (including Green Belt) will be needed. It should be recognised that the use of both brownfield and greenfield sites will be required in order to meet South Warwickshire’s development needs.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?

ID sylw: 108570

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Corbally Group (Harbury) Ltd

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The Policy Direction offers very little direction at all, solely stating that the Councils will have regard to the latest evidence when drafting this policy in full.

Affordable Housing

There is an acute affordability problem across the South Warwickshire Plan area. The HEDNA considered that the estimated annual need for affordable housing (rented and affordable home ownership) across Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick is 1,386 dwellings per annum. The Further Advice on Housing & Employment Land Needs report suggests that the affordable housing need has worsened, with the number of households on the two authorities housing registers having climbed from 7,048 in April 2021 to 7,684 in April 2023.

The Further Advice on Housing & Employment Land Needs report indicates that at least 2,772 dpa should be delivered in order to meet South Warwickshire’s affordable housing needs in full. It is imperative for the Councils to consider this when determining the total number of homes to plan for, as per the NPPG.

Housing for Older People

Any policy requirements for housing for older people must be justified and underpinned by the latest evidence on this matter.

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut i ddefnyddio’r system ac i wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.