BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Salford Priors Parish Council
Chwilio o’r newyddYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 87952
Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Salford Priors Parish Council
1) Balanced and sustainable approach to growth is essential to ensure that new development meets the diverse needs of our local communities while maintaining the character of our area.
2) It is also important to ensure that the accommodation needs of gypsy, traveller, and travelling show-people communities are met in suitable locations, with access to essential services and facilities.
3) Any new development must be accompanied by appropriate investment in local infrastructure, including healthcare, education, and community services, to support both new and existing residents.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
ID sylw: 87954
Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Salford Priors Parish Council
1. Balance the need for housing delivery with the protection of local housing needs and the appropriate scale of development for each settlement.
2. Review of the settlement hierarchy should ensure that any reclassification reflects local infrastructure capacity, environmental constraints, and community sustainability.
3. Neighbourhood Development Plans as a mechanism for allocating housing and employment land in smaller settlements is welcome, as it allows communities to shape development in a way that meets local needs.
4. Site selection must consider local infrastructure, services, and environmental impact to prevent overdevelopment in inappropriate locations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
ID sylw: 87955
Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Salford Priors Parish Council
1. There must be stronger guarantees that these contributions will be sufficient, timely, and directly benefit the local area.
2. Too often, infrastructure delivery lags behind housing development, placing increased strain on local roads, healthcare, schools, and public services before mitigations are in place.
3. the A46 corridor must be carefully considered to ensure they provide genuine benefits to local communities, rather than simply facilitating through-traffic at the expense of local road networks and environmental quality.
4. Any transport upgrades serve local needs first, rather than prioritizing regional and national traffic movements.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?
ID sylw: 87956
Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Salford Priors Parish Council
1. Support, in principle, the proposed road and rail projects, their successful implementation depends on a robust and fully costed delivery plan that prioritizes local needs and mitigates potential negative impacts.
2. Relief road projects, require thorough evaluation to ensure they provide long-term congestion relief without exacerbating environmental and community impacts.
3. A fully costed and transparent delivery plan, including clear timelines, funding sources, and impact assessments, is crucial to ensuring these infrastructure projects deliver real benefits for Stratford-on-Avon District and the wider county.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 7- Green Belt?
ID sylw: 87957
Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Salford Priors Parish Council
1. SWLP must fully reflect the significant changes introduced in the 2024 NPPF, particularly the new concept of "Grey Belt" land.
2. While the reclassification of certain Green Belt land may provide flexibility for development, it is essential that this does not lead to an automatic presumption in favour of development.
3. SWLP must continue to uphold the fundamental principles of Green Belt policy—preventing urban sprawl, protecting the countryside, and encouraging regeneration of brownfield sites within urban areas first.
4. SWLP to direct growth to the most sustainable locations while maintaining the integrity of the wider Green Belt.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
ID sylw: 87958
Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Salford Priors Parish Council
1. Setting clear density guidelines will help create balanced, attractive, and sustainable places while ensuring that new developments respond appropriately to their local context. Any policy should provide flexibility for site-specific considerations while ensuring that density levels support long-term environmental, social, and economic sustainability.
2. Density policies should also prevent excessive land consumption and sprawl, encouraging well-designed, sustainable growth that contributes positively to rural communities.
3. The policy needs to carefully managed to avoid overdevelopment, ensure high-quality design, and maintain adequate green space and infrastructure capacity.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?
ID sylw: 88999
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Salford Priors Parish Council
1. Ensuring that new homes are appropriately sized to meet local demand is crucial for delivering sustainable and inclusive communities.
2. flexibility should be maintained to allow for well-evidenced exceptions where different layouts may better serve specific local needs, such as single-occupancy or specialist housing.
3. The commitment to Accessible Living Standards is welcomed
4. To effectively meet local demand, policies should be supported by up-to-date evidence on demographic trends and housing needs, ensuring that new homes reflect both current and future requirements of the community.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 9 - Using Brownfield Land for Development?
ID sylw: 89000
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Salford Priors Parish Council
1. By prioritizing brownfield land for development is a positive step toward reducing pressure on greenfield sites and making efficient use of previously developed land.
2. Ensuring that brownfield sites outside urban areas are assessed for their sustainability aligns with the need for well-planned growth that supports infrastructure, services, and accessibility.
3. Plan proposals must be supported by robust infrastructure planning and service provision to avoid creating isolated or car-dependent communities.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-31- Sustainable Transport Accessibility?
ID sylw: 92047
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Salford Priors Parish Council
Future developments should prioritise sustainable transport by integrating dedicated cycle lanes, pedestrian paths, and well-connected public transport. Secure cycle parking, robust EV charging infrastructure, and public transport links to key locations should be included. Measures to minimise car dependency, such as car-sharing schemes and reduced parking provisions, are essential. Infrastructure should support individuals with disabilities, ensure equitable access, and promote affordable public transport for all. These steps will foster an inclusive, accessible, and environmentally responsible community. For the Parish of Salford Priors ensuring that public transport links effectively serve the towns of Evesham, Stratford-upon-Avon, and Honeybourne Railway Station is essential.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-34-Vale of Evesham Control Zone?
ID sylw: 92060
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Salford Priors Parish Council
Retention of the Vale of Evesham Control Zone is essential:
a) The policy remains necessary to manage business-related HGV movements effectively and mitigate environmental and infrastructure-related concerns. Retaining the policy will ensure continued protection for the region’s residents and road networks.
b) The policy seeks to control the number of additional HGV movements within the area resulting from business developments.
c) The policy thereby seeks to reduce the impact of HGV vehicles on local communities.