BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Tysoe Parish Council
Chwilio o’r newyddNo
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
ID sylw: 97096
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council
The local development plan assumes population growth and housing need until 2050, driving its policies. It proposes numerous Strategic Growth Locations and Potential New Settlements, which Tysoe Parish Council believe could harm South Warwickshire's rural character. Tysoe’s current protections will remain, but we strongly disagree with the SWLP's housing need assumption, which has increased by 104% compared to the Core Strategy, without credible evidence to justify this. This flawed premise risks considering unsuitable development sites and contradicts environmental goals. I cannot support the plan as presented due to these baseless housing numbers, despite some acceptable policies.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
ID sylw: 97099
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council
The use of the NSM makes this policy unacceptable.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?
ID sylw: 97101
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council
Many of the Potential New Settlement areas would not be considered if the NSM were not used.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
ID sylw: 97105
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council
Yes
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
ID sylw: 97108
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council
Our understanding is that much of the "overspill" from Coventry and Birmingham is already incorporated in the NSM.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
ID sylw: 97109
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council
Yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?
ID sylw: 97113
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council
Yes
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 7- Green Belt?
ID sylw: 97114
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council
If more sensible housing requirement assumptions were used Green Belt land would not be required to be considered.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
ID sylw: 97119
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council
Yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 9 - Using Brownfield Land for Development?
ID sylw: 97120
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council
Yes
