BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Moreton-in-Marsh Town Council
Chwilio o’r newyddOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
ID sylw: 107397
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Moreton-in-Marsh Town Council
The Town Council notes the views expressed in paragraph 3.12 ‘If a new settlement is located too close to an existing settlement, this could limit its ability to grow into a truly self-sustaining settlement, with a risk it functions merely as a dormitory to its neighbour. There is also a risk that a successful new settlement could act as a drag on the existing settlement, jeopardising its retail and employment provision...’ of the Technical Document New Settlements Assessment (As at Preferred Options) South Warwickshire Local Plan November 2024, relating to New Settlement Locations within the existing context particularly in respect of the identified Priority 3 location between the A44 and Great Wolford on the Parish Boundary of Moreton in Marsh.
MTC notes the priority 3 area outlined on its Parish Boundary between the A44 and Great Wolford (Spatial Growth Strategy Priority Areas map: Fig 5) and is concerned. This priority 3 location lies within the Special Landscape Area, close the AONB (Cotswold National Landscape) and directly on the Parish Boundary. Whilst Moreton in Marsh railway station Identified in the Technical Topic Paper Emerging Spatial Growth Strategy (November 2024) at point 4.15 as a Group A station is a point of note, Bus frequency point 4.22, proximity to major towns point 4.23 and major employment sites described in point 4.27 would not suggest the location to be attractive from a growth perspective.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?
ID sylw: 107398
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Moreton-in-Marsh Town Council
Noting the idea that a New Settlement needs to accommodate between 6,000 -10,000 dwellings, the agreed approach noted at point 2.1 for assessing suitability as requiring a nuanced and multi-layered approach, is welcomed.
In line with the selected option from the scoping consultation (Sustainable Travel and Economy) outlined in the Spatial Growth Topic Paper (emerging strategy), the development aims and assumptions and in particular reference to the potential for a New Settlement to function as a stand-alone settlement and the acknowledgement that this might result in very different infrastructure requirements based on capacity and location, is welcomed.
The HELAA paper notes 3 constraints: Agricultural Land Quality • Potential Local Wildlife Sites • Surface Water Flooding, these constraints combined with the New Settlement Methodology seem comprehensive, lending themselves to a geospatial approach which in turn makes sense of the Red, amber Green (RAG) assessment criteria when applied against aspects of sustainable development, connectivity, health and inclusivity, biodiversity, climate, Net Zero etc…
The Town Council notes the views expressed in paragraph 3.12 ‘If a new settlement is located too close to an existing settlement, this could limit its ability to grow into a truly self-sustaining settlement, with a risk it functions merely as a dormitory to its neighbour. There is also a risk that a successful new settlement could act as a drag on the existing settlement, jeopardising its retail and employment provision…’ of the Technical Document New Settlements Assessment (As at Preferred Options) South Warwickshire Local Plan November 2024, relating to New Settlement Locations within the existing context particularly in respect of the identified Priority 3 location between the A44 and Great Wolford on the Parish boundary of Moreton in Marsh.