BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Alderley Holdings Trust
Chwilio o’r newyddNo
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-32- Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Strategy?
ID sylw: 101518
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
It should be noted that Part S to the Building Regulations provides technical guidance regarding charge point requirements that developers are obliged to meet. This somewhat negates the need for a robust policy on EV charging infrastructure for new developments and thus the policy should make reference to the Building Regulations instead. Further, any policy should build on the Warwick District Council Net Zero DPD, adopted in May 2024, which currently provides no specific guidance for developers in relation to the provision of EV charging points or ultra-low emission vehicles.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Healthy, Safe, and Inclusive South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 101522
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The formation of the SWLP policies should continue to be based on a collaborative approach to mitigating environmental and health impacts. More clarity is required on what will be detrimental to health and wellbeing.
Introduction of a Screening Report could help in determining what is detrimental, however the blanket policy for all major developments is not justified. Instead, the policy should isolate impacts and only require screening and assessment where a proposal would clearly be detrimental.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-30- Health Impact Assessment for Major Development?
ID sylw: 101523
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
Housing and mixed-use schemes naturally contribute to improved community welfare by delivering high-quality homes, green spaces, and social infrastructure. Existing environmental health regulations, national space standards, and policies on sustainability and renewable energy already provide safeguards for health considerations within the planning process. The policy could better recognise the inherent health benefits of well-designed housing schemes, which provide safe, sustainable, and high-quality living environments.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-29-Pollution?
ID sylw: 101526
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
An approach where environmental enhancement and pollution reduction are integrated into developments from the outset is supported. The proposed requirement that new development proposals do not have an adverse impact on existing operations lacks specificity regarding what constitutes 'existing operations' and the threshold at which an effect would be deemed unacceptable. Where development is considered to have a detrimental impact on environmental quality, there are already established legal responsibilities that prevent adverse effects, in the NPPF and statutory environmental protection.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 101528
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 28- Waterways?
ID sylw: 101531
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
Draft Policy Direction 28’s aim to promote the use and accessibility of waterways in South Warwickshire is supported. The policy appropriately recognises the ecological benefits of waterways and seeks to protect them from harmful development while encouraging regeneration.
Further clarity is needed on what constitutes an “adverse impact” on the integrity of the waterways structure, water quality, landscape, heritage and ecological quality and character. Clear definitions or criteria would ensure greater consistency in decision-making and provide developers with a better understanding of policy requirements.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?
ID sylw: 101533
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
Draft Policy Direction 26 aligns with the NPPF, which encourages the use of design codes to provide clarity about design expectations. The policy’s commitment to a wide range of design codes, including area-wide, site-specific and densification design codes is strongly supported as it will help to deliver context-sensitive and locally appropriate design solutions.
While the policy correctly references the National Design Guide, it should also directly reference the National Model Design Code, which provides a framework for preparing local design codes. Including both will ensure the policy fully aligns with NPPF Paragraph 133 and national best practice.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Climate Resilient and Net Zero Carbon South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 101535
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The thrust of this chapter, which aims for climate resilience and zero carbon in the plan area is in line with national policy and targets. Some of the figures and requirements, however, along with the wording of some of the policies are considered to be unsound, as set out in the above responses. In particular some policies will need to be evidenced for feasibility, and all will need to be viability tested.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- I- Water Supply and Wastewater Infrastructure?
ID sylw: 101538
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The requirement for development to mitigate any increase in surface water runoff with SuDS is supported, along with ensuring that there is adequate water supply resulting from any development proposals.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-H- Water Efficiency?
ID sylw: 101539
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
In our experience and analysis it is difficult to reduce water use to the levels described without compromising functionality, unless Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) for internal use is incorporated. RWH is rarely used on housing due to the cost, ongoing management issues and additional embodied carbon. Research also suggests that RWH increases CO² emissions at a time when we are seeking to reduce emissions. A target of 110 litres per person is considered more achievable and in line with the Government’s own guidance.