BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Squab Hall Farm
Chwilio o’r newyddYes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG11 Question
ID sylw: 97211
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
Squab Hall Farm is a feasible and suitable location for growth. The SWLP should recognise this deliverability and allocate the Site for the outlined development.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
ID sylw: 97219
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
We raise into question the utility and methodology of a number of the HELAA results, as outlined.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
ID sylw: 97226
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The South Warwickshire Councils must continually review the Local Housing Need up to adoption, they must consider an increased higher housing need, implement a 5% lapse rate to account for unimplemented commitments, and reassess the existing commitments and windfall allowance as outlined.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?
ID sylw: 97228
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The Family (Evans Family Trust) agree to the inclusion of the X2 as an option for a New Settlement. The Family have prepared a separate submission on behalf of all of the landowners who control land within the X2 New Settlement option.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
ID sylw: 97232
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
It is imperative that the SWLP adequately considers accommodating unmet housing needs arising from outside of South Warwickshire. There are significant unmet needs arising from the GBBCHMA which require attention, and potential unmet needs arising from Coventry which should be taken account of accordingly. There is also potential for unmet needs arising from Cotswold District, Redditch Borough and Solihull Metropolitan Borough which should be considered. Failure to do so would render the SWLP not positively prepared nor effective and thus unsound in line with Paragraph 36 a) and c) of the NPPF.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
ID sylw: 97236
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?
ID sylw: 97238
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?
ID sylw: 97241
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The NPPF at Footnote 51 is clear that optional technical standards and the Nationally Described Space Standard should only be enforced through planning policy where this would address an identified need and where it can be justified. Policies will need to be tested for their impact on viability.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?
ID sylw: 97244
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The best way to deliver self and custom build homes to meet identified needs is to allocate specific sites designed to cater for such homes. Sites will be smaller by their nature, and therefore more responsive to market demand and more likely to be attractive to those wishing to develop their own homes. Larger sites can only efficiently be developed by the major housebuilders, and the inclusion of self and custom build within their developments can create health and safety and operational difficulties when homes in areas are being built by multiple developers to different timescales and standards.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-11- Meeting the Accommodation Needs of Gypsies, Travellers, Travelling Showpeople and Boat Dwellers?
ID sylw: 97245
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
A blanket requirement for provision of Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople accommodation within all sites over 500 homes is not considered acceptable. The suitability of sites of this scale to accommodate the identified need should be assessed on a site-by-site basis; having regard to the scale and distribution of need, and the constraints and opportunities presented by the proposed allocations. Sites may also come forward elsewhere in the District through windfalls, and therefore the need and timing of provision will need to be kept under review.