BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Summers Holdings Ltd
Chwilio o’r newyddNo
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question G1
ID sylw: 102766
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
It does not contain any Call for Sites submissions - why is it included?
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?
ID sylw: 102770
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
No, we fail to understand why some of the specific new settlement locations have been chosen and how disconnected they are from the Call for Sites exercises. We would also question the integrity of inviting further Call for Sites submissions where none were previously submitted. Were prospective new settlements to be identified then they should have drawn on the Call for Sites results, as they have been, as in the case of proposed new settlements A1 and A2, which are supported by our client.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
ID sylw: 102777
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The potential for smaller scale developments to fulfil a significant role in meeting future growth needs should be recognised and given as much importance as strategic allocations. Existing settlement boundaries should be reviewed and new boundaries created. Tanworth-in-Arden contains 2 HELAA B sites (515 and 758) to allow smaller scale development supporting its services and facilities and in villages nearby.
Green Belt policy changes need to be fully taken on-board, e.g. Site 758 is Grey Belt. This is likely to increase the number of small-scale developments.
In a predominantly rural area, small sites should contribute significantly > 10% of supply.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
ID sylw: 102781
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
There is a need for greater certainty and quantification on meeting cross-boundary needs. The suggestion in the Policy Direction for the capacity to be identified on reserve site released only when supply in the source area falls below 5 years is unworkable. Also, this forgets that some of the requirement might be for other types of development.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
ID sylw: 102795
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Our client considers there are some important points to make on this:
(1) this statement implies the critical technical work to justify the plan is not in place, and
(2) why should the IDP being 'live' only apply up to submission and not be continuous even post adoption?
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?
ID sylw: 102804
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
This policy direction implies that transport infrastructure trumps all other infrastructure types with other types of infrastructure dealt with as after-thoughts.
If the pattern of development is over-reliant on strategic level growth that requires too many large-scale infrastructure projects to deliver it, then the scale of growth might be constrained.
Decisions on major investment locations seem to have been taken outside the key public transport corridors whereas a different approach appears to apply in relation to housing and smaller scale employment proposals. This suggests there is too high a focus given to transport considerations in the emerging plan.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 7- Green Belt?
ID sylw: 102816
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The consultation itself appears to confirm that it has been overtaken by events and should be rerun at a later date taking account of responses, e.g. changes in Green Belt policy including the introduction of grey belt? This would enable, for example, detailed policy wording to be added.
Notwithstanding that, it is clear from the Councils’ own interpretation of Site 515 under the HELAA B that the site is Grey Belt and therefore its development would not be considered to be inappropriate, subject to its compliance with the Golden Rules, which the site could meet.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 102828
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The planning process seems to have run into various cul-de-sacs. There is a need to focus on:
• the level of growth required - housing and employment
• how this should be accommodated, urban/ rural, small, medium and strategic level growth including a possible new settlement(s)
• a single rather than 2-part plan
• settlement boundary reviews or establish where appropriate
• embrace updated NPPF especially with regard to Green Belt and Grey Belt
• embrace infrastructure ‘in the round’
• deploy development to help achieve 20-minute neighbourhoods in all areas.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?
ID sylw: 102832
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The consultation states, "5.1 Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes - The councils will have regard to the latest evidence in drafting policies relating to housing tenure and type."
This policy needs to be specific to be subject to informed comment.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?
ID sylw: 102840
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
This provision should be discretionary since most self-builders are unlikely to want a site being built by a volume housebuilder.
Also, suggested re-word from "On suitable sites adjacent to defined settlement boundaries to meet a district-wide need." to "On suitable sites adjacent to existing settlements to meet a district-wide need.
Those suggested changes would be consistent with the results of earlier consultation outcomes.
Site 515 is an ideal site for Custom and Self Building Housing. The Districts’ planning policies should encourage this on smaller sites. Allocation of Site 515 would ensure that the Council is making adequate provision as required.