BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Chwilio o’r newyddOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-H- Water Efficiency?
ID sylw: 102335
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
While broadly supportive, it is recommended the Council give further consideration to the technical feasibility and costs of this Policy as part of the next stage of Plan preparation to ensure any proposals are feasible and viable.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- J- Reducing Flood Risk?
ID sylw: 102339
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
Taylor Wimpey largely has no concerns with the policy. However, reference to new development being required to “seek opportunities for river restoration and enhancement, e.g. de-culverting, removing structures and reinstating a natural, sinuous river channel” should be clarified, particularly in respect of the detail required to demonstrate that this has been explored by a proposed development. In addition, given the potential cost associated with these activities, reference should be made in the policy that this will be subject to viability.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- K- Multifunctional Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)?
ID sylw: 102343
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
The policy sets out that SUDs should be above ground, given the opportunities to provide biodiversity and water quality enhancements. However, this may not always be the most appropriate drainage option and as such, should be considered on a site-by-site basis, potentially with a preference for above ground intervention.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Climate Resilient and Net Zero Carbon South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 102347
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
Taylor Wimpey broadly supports the objectives set out in the Plan to reduce GHG emissions and to ensure development is resilient to the effects of climate change. This notwithstanding, we have concerns about elements of the proposals which do not align with Government guidance and have not yet been adequately evidenced or considered as part of a viability assessment. Further work is required to ensure that the policy requirements set out are feasible. We recommend that the adopted Warwick Net Zero DPD is considered as part of the development of the Plan’s sustainability and climate change policies.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-25- Strategic Design Principles?
ID sylw: 102354
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
Taylor Wimpey supports the Draft Policy Direction in principle and emphasises the opportunity presented by the Site at land at north Leamington as demonstrated by the Vision Document. Further detail in respect of the Site is submitted via the Call for Sites exercise being undertaken in parallel with the Regulation 18 consultation.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?
ID sylw: 102368
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
Taylor Wimpey supports the Draft Policy Direction in principle and emphasises the opportunity presented by the Site at land at north Leamington as demonstrated by the Vision Document. Further detail in respect of the Site is submitted via the Call for Sites exercise being undertaken in parallel with the Regulation 18 consultation.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 27 Protecting and Enhancing Heritage Assets/ the Historic Environment?
ID sylw: 102386
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
Taylor Wimpey broadly supports the objectives set out in the Plan in relation to the historic environment.
We have concerns about elements of the Plan which do not align with the statutory duties, under S16(2), S66(1) and S72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 or the Chapter 16 of the NPPF.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 102388
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
Taylor Wimpey are able to broadly support the direction of travel in relation to the ‘A Well-designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire Chapter’ however, as set out in the responses to each of the specific questions, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-31- Sustainable Transport Accessibility?
ID sylw: 102394
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
The Draft Policy Direction is supported in principle. However, the policy should provide clarity on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-32- Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Strategy?
ID sylw: 102399
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
Any provision beyond the Building Regulations will need to be justified, evidenced and considered as part of a viability assessment.
