BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Chwilio o’r newyddOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 102814
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
The Threshold for a “strategic allocation” needs to be confirmed in order to fully comment on, or support, the approach to the SWLP Part 1 Plan. Without this clarification it is difficult to provide a detailed comment on this aspect of the Plan.
Should the SWLP be split into two plans, the Part 1 Plan should set out how the overall housing requirements for the SWLP area are to be met through a clear settlement hierarchy. This approach will ensure any Part 2 Plan and future Neighbourhood Development Plans can progress as quickly as possible due to aligning with the Part 1 Plan. Further, in the interim period between the various plans being adopted / made, this approach would allow sustainable development that is in accordance with the Part 1 Plan and the NPPF to come forward and provide a much needed immediate supply of housing for the SWLP area.
Notwithstanding this, Richborough consider that the SWLP should progress as a single Local Plan with the focus on enabling housing delivery as soon as possible.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 102870
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
References to unmet housing needs and request for further detail
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
ID sylw: 102983
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
The policy should be updated to remove any reference to the HEDNA and instead solely focus on the 2024 standard method as a starting point. Additional adjustments to be made in relation to economic growth and affordability.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
ID sylw: 103038
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
Additional site information in relation to site REFID 42
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
ID sylw: 103099
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
There needs to be more clarification throughout the SWLP about what a ‘Strategic Allocation’ is and what a ‘small-scale development’ is.
Richborough encourage the SWLP authorities to consider the sites put forward through the Call-for-Sites and how these align with the ‘Spatial Growth Strategy Priority Areas 1 to 3’ and provide sufficient information within the SWLP to allow these sites to be delivered.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
ID sylw: 103123
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
The SWLP authorities should accommodate an appropriate proportion of the emerging Greater Birmingham and Black Country Housing Market Area (GBBCHMA) and Coventry and Warwickshire Housing Market Area (CWHMA) housing shortfall to 2050 – once this is established through the publication of a joint evidence base. The SWLP authorities should ensure that the next iteration of the Plan provides a positive and flexible approach to ensure this can happen.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
ID sylw: 103190
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
Richborough generally support development being consistent with and contributing to the transport strategies referred to within Draft Policy Direction 5. However at this stage the IDP has not been progressed to a point to be able to fully understand the details of the specific transport strategies. In addition to the implementation of the transport strategies, any site specific infrastructure and other requirements in any forthcoming allocation policies will need to be proportionate to the scale of development proposed, based on up-to-date evidence of need and subject to viability (which should be explicitly referenced in the policy wording). These requirements will also need to be justified through the evolving IDP.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
ID sylw: 103215
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
Richborough has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.
With regard to the reference to Design Codes, it is recommended that the future policy text for Draft Policy Direction 8 should cross refer to Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’ and the supporting text. Richborough have provided more detailed comments in relation to Design Codes within their response to Draft Policy Direction 26.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 103233
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
Richborough generally support the overall approach to the Meeting South Warwickshire’s Sustainable Development Requirements chapter, however in order to fully respond and therefore fully support the proposals, a significant amount of additional detail is required.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?
ID sylw: 103268
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
Any future policy must reflect the most up to date evidence. The policy wording should also be flexible and be able to respond to changes to national policies and updated evidence throughout the lifetime of the Plan.
