BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Grevayne Properties Limited
Chwilio o’r newyddNo
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?
ID sylw: 101809
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
We fail to understand why some of the specific new settlement locations have been chosen and how disconnected they are from the Stage 1 and 2 Call for Sites exercises. We would also question the integrity of inviting further Call for Sites submissions where none were previously submitted.
Our client's proposed development of Site 490 at Baddesley Clinton and Site 491 at Harbury utilise sites already identified through the Call for Sites and supported through the Part B HELAA that are available for development in the short term.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
ID sylw: 101825
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The plan should recognise the potential for smaller scale developments to fulfil a significant role in meeting future growth needs. Existing settlement boundaries should be reviewed including Baddesley Clinton, specifically to enable development of the land at Bedlam’s End (Site ref: 490), which would now be viewed as Grey Belt.
The review of settlement boundaries and allocation of sites for development should take place now and not be deferred until a Part 2 local plan. Without this the new local plan will lack certainty and fail to contribute sufficiently to the acceleration of housebuilding in accordance with Government policy.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
ID sylw: 101831
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
There is a need for greater certainty and quantification on meeting cross-boundary needs. The suggestion in the Policy Direction for the capacity to be identified on reserve sites released only when supply in the source area falls below 5 years is unworkable. Also, this forgets that some of the requirement might be for other types of development.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
ID sylw: 101838
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The consultation report suggests, "the IDP will include an Infrastructure Delivery Schedule for each district. This IDP remains 'a live document' and the Local Planning Authorities will continue to work with infrastructure providers and other stakeholders to refine its contents up to submission of the Local Plan."
Our client considers there are some important points to make on this:
(1) this statement implies the critical technical work to justify the plan is not in place, and
(2) why should the IDP being 'live' only apply up to submission and not be continuous even post adoption?
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?
ID sylw: 101848
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
There is concern this policy direction implies that transport infrastructure trumps all other infrastructure types with other types of infrastructure dealt with as after-thoughts.
It is also the case that if the pattern of development is over-reliant on strategic level growth that requires too many large-scale infrastructure projects to deliver it, then the scale of growth might be constrained.
Figure 9 illustrates how decisions on major investment locations seem to have been taken outside the key public transport corridors whereas a different approach appears to apply in relation to housing and smaller scale employment proposals.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 7- Green Belt?
ID sylw: 101869
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The consultation has been overtaken by events with the advent of the "Grey Belt" in the December 2024 NPPF and should be rerun at a later date taking account of responses. A rerun would enable detailed policy wording to be added.
Notwithstanding, it is clear that an analysis of the purposes of Green Belt for the land identified at Bedlam's End (site ref: 490) for potential development would not contribute strongly to purposes a), b) and d) of Green Belt, and thereby would appear to constitute “Grey Belt” land.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 101898
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
There is a need to focus on:
• the level of growth - housing and employment
• how this should be accommodated, urban/ rural, small, medium and strategic level growth
• a single rather than 2-part plan
• identify and carry out settlement boundary reviews
• embrace the December 2024 NPPF update especially with regard to Green Belt and the development of Grey Belt sites such as site Ref: 490 at Baddesley Clinton.
• embrace infrastructure ‘in the round’
• deploy development to help achieve 20-minute neighbourhoods in urban and rural areas, such as Baddesley Clinton and Harbury.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?
ID sylw: 101919
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The consultation states, "5.1 Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes - The councils will have regard to the latest evidence in drafting policies relating to housing tenure and type."
This policy needs to be specific to be subject to informed comment.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?
ID sylw: 101969
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The policy states that 5% of the developable area of a site is to be made available for the provision of self-build and custom-build homes. This provision should be discretionary not a requirement since most self-builders are unlikely to want a site being built by a volume housebuilder.
Notwithstanding the above, site ref: 490 at Bedlam’s End, Baddesley Clinton, could be an ideal site, even if just in part, for Custom and Self Building Housing. The allocation of land at Bedlam’s End would ensure that the Council is making adequate provision for Custom and Self Building Housing, as required.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy C- Protecting Community Facilities?
ID sylw: 101989
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited
Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
It is noted that this policy confirms that community facilities and services contribute to the sustainability of communities, and that planning policies and decisions should enable the retention and development of accessible local services and community facilities.
In the case of our client's land at Bedlam’s End, Baddesley Clinton (site ref: 490) and Springfield Farm, Harbury (site ref: 491) these have the potential to help sustain and justify the expansion of local services.
