BASE HEADER

Preferred Options 2025

Chwilio sylwadau

Canlyniadau chwilio Peter Drew Contracts Ltd

Chwilio o’r newydd Chwilio o’r newydd

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Strategic Growth Location SG20 Question

ID sylw: 101974

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Drew Contracts Ltd

Asiant : RCA Regeneration

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Our client owns a site within SG20 and supports its proposed allocation as a Strategic Growth Location.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?

ID sylw: 101979

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Drew Contracts Ltd

Asiant : RCA Regeneration

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The draft policy sets out that the SWLP makes provision for at least the HEDNA number of 1679 dwellings per annum, “with sufficient flexibility to accommodate up to 2,188 dwellings per annum, in line with the 2024 NPPF Standard Method”. We consider that the SWLP should provide for the Standard Method housing requirement as a minimum to ensure that sufficient housing is delivered across the plan period. Planning to provide for less than the Standard Method housing requirement is not a sound basis for the plan.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?

ID sylw: 101994

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Drew Contracts Ltd

Asiant : RCA Regeneration

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Our client owns site 361 - 2 Bidford Road, Broom, Alcester, part of proposed allocation SG20. It is a Brownfield site proposed for residential use. The small industrial unit on the site is currently occupied but the company want to move from the existing premises because there is insufficient room for expansion. Attempts to sell the site as an industrial site have been unsuccessful due to its small size and location. Residential redevelopment of the site would not therefore cause unacceptable loss of employment land.

Rural listed buildings and scheduled monuments scoring should not be applied at strategic level.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?

ID sylw: 102002

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Drew Contracts Ltd

Asiant : RCA Regeneration

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The principle of supporting Self and Custom Build housing is supported. However these should be on small sites or unallocated sites, not on larger housing sites - the demand for these plots tends to be in more isolated locations.
The identification of local need should include need identified by the Self and Custom Build Register, rather than requiring a need identified by or supported by the local community. Alternatively the definition of district-wide need should specifically include need demonstrated for that area on the Self and Custom Build register.

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut i ddefnyddio’r system ac i wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.