BASE HEADER
Publication Draft
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio A C Lloyd
Chwilio o’r newyddGwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for the Natural Environment, particularly in respect of amendments to the Area of Restraint designation?
ID sylw: 33653
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd
Asiant : Barton Willmore
We do not object in principle to the designation of an Area of Restraint between Heathcote Farm and Bishops Tachbrook. However, the boundary should be amended adjacent to the village in order to allow for some limited development and should therefore follow the line of the most northern part of the village. The boundary should also be flexible to allow for local services and facilities.
The designation between Leamington and Radford Semele should also be amended to allow for some limited development adjoining the village. The exact line should follow the most western part of the development.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Vision for Warwick District to 2026?
ID sylw: 33875
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd
Asiant : Redline
Support, however, where significant community advantage can be brought forward as a result of new development allocation, then such proposals should be given greater weight in the determination of allocation choice and priority.
Sylw
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Growth Strategy for Warwick District to 2026?
ID sylw: 33876
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd
Asiant : Redline
Emphasise the significant educational, general community, recreational and environmental advanatages that can emerge from substantial residential development at South Sydenham.
Sylw
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Strategic Objectives for Warwick District?
ID sylw: 33877
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd
Asiant : Redline
Agreed, pending the final determination of the RSS.
Sylw
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Regeneration?
ID sylw: 33878
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd
Asiant : Redline
The Sydenham and Whitnash areas display serious indicators of declining services in both public and private facilities. The proposals put forward in respect of South Sydenham can redress a number of these deficiencies and act as a catalyst for regeneration.
Sylw
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Regeneration?
ID sylw: 33879
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd
Asiant : Redline
The proposals for South Sydenham should be introduced as a major regeneration component.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?
ID sylw: 33880
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd
Asiant : Redline
The proposals put forward in respect of South Sydenham bring forward a catalyst for regeneration in this area and a substantial new school proposal. Priority should be given to development proposals that bring forward regeneration/gain to existing communities.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?
ID sylw: 33881
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd
Asiant : Redline
Support, however, where significant regeneration/community gain can emerge from new development, other standards (notably social housing standards) may need to be treated on a site specific basis.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing affordable homes?
ID sylw: 33882
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd
Asiant : Redline
Support, however, where significant regeneration/community gain can emerge from new development, other standards (notably social housing standards) may need to be treated on a site specific basis.
Sylw
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for the density of new housing?
ID sylw: 33883
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd
Asiant : Redline
Density needs to respond to site circumstances.
