BASE HEADER
Publication Draft
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Crackley Residents' Association
Chwilio o’r newyddCefnogi
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Vision for Warwick District to 2026?
ID sylw: 33547
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Crackley Residents' Association
Crackley Residents' Assiociation (CRA) in general agreement with vision
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Growth Strategy for Warwick District to 2026?
ID sylw: 33548
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Crackley Residents' Association
General agreement about Growth Strategy, particularly protection of Green Belt to separate Kenilworth from the urban area of Coventry in north and strict control development within open countryside.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Strategic Objectives for Warwick District?
ID sylw: 33549
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Crackley Residents' Association
General agreement about Growth Strategy, particularly protection of Green Belt to separate Kenilworth from the urban area of Coventry in north and strict control development within open countryside.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Growth Strategy for Warwick District to 2026?
ID sylw: 33550
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Crackley Residents' Association
CRA not in agreement with development on fringe of built up area of Coventry- contradicts green belt protection and maintainance of open countryside between Kenilworth and Coventry. Planned growth and its associated infrastructure at Warwick University and Kings Hill will adversely affect this area.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new employment land?
ID sylw: 33551
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Crackley Residents' Association
Does not agree with employment/ development on the Kings Hill site because of the reasons detalied above- i.e. adverse impact on the green belt.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?
ID sylw: 33552
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Crackley Residents' Association
CRA objects to the significant proportion of the Kings Hill site for new housing. CRA does not support significant development of this area. In addition to the scale of the residential development, the requisite infrastructural improvements (transport, power, gas sewage,etc) will evitably have a detrimental effect on the entire area..
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
(ix) Land at Kings Hill, south of Green Lane, Finham
ID sylw: 33553
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Crackley Residents' Association
CRA objects to the significant proportion of the Kings Hill site for new housing. CRA does not support significant development of this area. In addition to the scale of the residential development, the requisite infrastructural improvements (transport, power, gas sewage,etc) will evitably have a detrimental effect on the entire area..
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for the density of new housing?
ID sylw: 33554
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Crackley Residents' Association
Supports mix of housing proposed and density.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for the density of new housing?
ID sylw: 33555
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Crackley Residents' Association
Supports mix of housing proposed and density.
Sylw
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Infrastructure?
ID sylw: 33556
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Crackley Residents' Association
Await the publication of the Infrastructure Delivery Plan with the draft Core Strategy and comment accordingly.
