BASE HEADER
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Historic England
Chwilio o’r newyddGwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
The National Planning Policy Framework
ID sylw: 61308
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
-Policies for allocated sites need to make reference to important historic environment considerations in order to guide how development should be delivered.
-The NPPF requires Local Plans, to set out a positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of the historic environment. This means ensuring that the proposed sites put forward for development, will assist in delivering such a strategy and not contradict it.
-The selection of sites for development needs to be informed by the evidence base and the Plan should avoid allocating those sites which are likely to result in harm to the significance of the heritage asset.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
Technical Studies and Research Findings
ID sylw: 61441
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
Your Landscape Sensitivity Assessment (November 2013) fails to provide an appropriate historic environment assessment. It fails to assess whether, how and to what degree the settings of affected heritage assets make a contribution to their significance, and set out how the proposed development would affect that significance.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
1) Land north of Rosewood Farm
ID sylw: 61444
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
The evidence base, fails to establish how site 1 at Baginton contributes to the character, appearance and significance of the Conservation Area; and the effect of the proposed development on those attributes. It appears neither the Baginton Conservation Area Appraisal nor the industry standard guidance on assessing the impact of development on the setting of heritage assets have been applied. Consequently it is not clear whether the proposals are in accordance with the NPPF policies for the protection and enhancement of the historic environment and Section 66 (1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
2) The former Sherbourne Nursery site north of Westham Lane
ID sylw: 61446
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
The evidence base, fails to establish how Site 2 at Barford contributes to the character, appearance and significance of the Conservation Area; and the effect of the proposed development on those attributes. It appears neither the Baginton Conservation Area Appraisal nor the industry standard guidance on assessing the impact of development on the setting of heritage assets have been applied. Consequently it is not clear whether the proposals are in accordance with the NPPF policies for the protection and enhancement of the historic environment and Section 66 (1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
Land south of Hill Wootton Road
ID sylw: 61449
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
The evidence base, fails to establish how Site 1, Hill Wootton contributes to the character, appearance and significance of the Conservation Area; and the effect of the proposed development on those attributes. It's not clear whether the proposals are in accordance with the NPPF policies for the protection and enhancement of the historic environment and Section 66 (1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
The proposed allocation is directly opposite a Grade II listed building. How does the setting contribute to the listed buildings significance and what is the implication of the development on that significance?
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
1) The Paddock, Woodcote House
ID sylw: 61451
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
-The evidence base fails to establish how Site 1 contributes to the character, appearance and significance of the Conservation Area; and the effect of the proposed development on those attributes. It's not clear whether the proposals are in accordance with the NPPF policies for the protection and enhancement of the historic environment and Section 66 (1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
-A sizable development is proposed within the setting of Woodcote House. Evidence needs to demonstrate the significance of the heritage assets has been established and the impacts on that significance understood.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
1) Land to the east of Church Lane
ID sylw: 61454
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
The evidence base fails to establish how Site 1 contributes to the character, appearance and significance of the Conservation Area; and the effect of the proposed development on those attributes. It's not clear whether the proposals are in accordance with the NPPF policies for the protection and enhancement of the historic environment and Section 66 (1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
-The surroundings of the Church (Grade II listed) and other neighbouring heritage assets contribute to their significance. A robust setting assessment should be prepared in accordance with the aforementioned advice to inform this proposal.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
Former Aylesbury House
ID sylw: 61458
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
-The evidence base fails to establish how the Site contributes to the character, appearance and significance of the Conservation Area; and the effect of the proposed development on those attributes. It's not clear whether the proposals are in accordance with NPPF policies for the protection and enhancement of the historic environment and Section 66 of the Planning Act 1990.
-It will have a direct impact on the significance of the listed building.
-As this complex's setting clearly contributes to its significance, any harm must be limited but may be justified.
-A specific historic environment assessment of the site is essential.
see attached