BASE HEADER
Publication Draft
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Historic England
Chwilio o’r newyddGwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Providing well-designed new developments that are in the right location and address climate change
ID sylw: 66063
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi
EH welcomes the principle of this sub objective however suggests a minor clarification to ensure consistency with national planning policy.
See attachment.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
DS3 Supporting Sustainable Communities
ID sylw: 66064
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
We welcome, support and endorse this policy.
See attachment.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
CT7 Warwick Castle and Warwick Racecourse/St Mary's Lands
ID sylw: 66065
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
EH welcomes the principle of the initiative. Due to the national importance of the Castle and the intended role of the masterplan in shaping the future of the site, English Heritage would welcome the opportunity be a partner in its preparation.
If the masterplan is to be a development plan should its preparation be subject to the same rigor and discipline of a local plan?
It should also be recognised that Warwick Castle is also a Scheduled Monument
See attachment.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
H4 Securing a Mix of Housing
ID sylw: 66066
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
We welcome, support and endorse this policy.
See attachment.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
SC0 Sustainable Communities
ID sylw: 66067
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
We welcome, support and endorse this policy.
See attachment.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
CC2 Planning for Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Generation
ID sylw: 66068
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi
As drafted this criteria is inconsistent with the NPPF. Its core planning principles in para 17 mention both the Government's desire to encourage the use of renewable resources and the need to 'conserve heritage assets in a manner appropriate for their significance'.
See attachment.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Transport
ID sylw: 66070
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi
Although we support this policy, it is not clear that the implications for the historic environment arising from major development to the south of Warwick have been fully addressed in accordance to such a commitment.
See attachment.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
TR1 Access and Choice
ID sylw: 66071
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi
Mindful of the commitment in paragraph 5.29 and 5.41 it is of concern there is no criteria in this policy to ensure transport infrastructure responds positively to the historic environment.
It is not clear whether such guidance has been applied to inform an understanding of the implications for the historic environment arising from major development to the south of Warwick.
See attachment.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
TR2 Traffic Generation
ID sylw: 66072
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi
The policy fails to address the appropriate response arising from development that results in increased traffic generation potentially harming the significance of the Districts historic environment.
Whilst a commitment to undertake such an assessment is welcomed it needs to take place at this stage, rather than when a planning application is submitted to inform the principle of the strategic allocations to the south of Warwick.
See attachment.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
H06 East of Kenilworth (Thickthorn)
ID sylw: 66075
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Historic England
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi
The development affects Thickthorn Manor and the Glasshouse Roman Settlement. There is no evidence to demonstrate a proper assessment has been undertaken to inform the principle of development, nor, without prejudice, the critical design response (mitigation).
It should be appreciated that due to the former Roman occupation of the site there also needs to be an assessment of the likelihood that currently unidentified archaeology, potentially of national importance, will be discovered (NPPF para 169).
Without such an assessment the local authority is unable to assert that the objectives for sustainable development have been met.
There appears to be a failure to demonstrate that great weight has been given to the conservation of the heritage assets (NPPF para 132) nor a recognition of the legislative expectation that special weight is paid to the desirability of preserving the setting of the affected Manor. The Ancient Monument and Archaeological Areas Act gives provision for the protection of the scheduled Roman Settlement.
The significance of a heritage asset derives not only from its physical presence but also from its setting - the surroundings in which it is experienced. Consequently English Heritage considers the Plan is inconsistent with the provisions of the NPPF and therefore unsound.
See attachment.
