BASE HEADER
Publication Draft
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Friends of the Earth
Chwilio o’r newyddCefnogi
Publication Draft
Built Environment
ID sylw: 66536
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Friends of the Earth
Nifer y bobl: 4
We support these proposals.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
BE1 Layout and Design
ID sylw: 66537
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Friends of the Earth
Nifer y bobl: 4
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi
We suggest Paragraph 5.11 (bullet point 3) should not say 'taking into account the Garden Towns prospectus' as this suggests that only Garden Town type layouts will be given consent. We suggest the wording might be: 'identify design principles for the development proposed taking account of any supplementary planning guidance produced by the District Council'.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
BE2 Developing Strategic Housing Sites
ID sylw: 66538
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Friends of the Earth
Nifer y bobl: 4
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi
the wording in BE2 (d) (and 5.13) which says 'design principles, taking account of the Garden Towns, Villages and Suburbs Prospectus and Buildings for Life 12;' should instead read ' design principles, taking account of any supplementary planning guidance produced by the District Council'
see attached
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
BE2 Developing Strategic Housing Sites
ID sylw: 66539
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Friends of the Earth
Nifer y bobl: 4
We support paragraph 5.18 which acknowledges that high density housing may be appropriate for town centre or similar sites.
see attached
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
Transport
ID sylw: 66544
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Friends of the Earth
Nifer y bobl: 4
Proposed Policies TR1 - TR6 (Transport)
We support these proposals. However we do have some comments:
We support the proposals in the Sustainable Transport Technical Note (Appendix D of the Strategic Transport Assessment Stage 4), particularly the mention of the proposed Kenilworth to Leamington cycle route (K2L), though we do not agree that 'the cycle network within the Warwick and Leamington area is reasonably well developed' - we believe that it could be considerably improved. There should be the aim to provide exemplary cycle and walking routes within and near to all new developments in order to maximise cycling and walking in those areas. Links to all town centres and railway stations are particularly important.
see attached
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
TR5 Safeguarding for Transport Infrastructure
ID sylw: 66545
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Friends of the Earth
Nifer y bobl: 4
We support the proposal that the southern Park and Ride will serve both Warwick and Leamington. However we suggest that the detailed design will be very important, so that the facility does not have a major effect on the openness of the countryside, and should not include floodlighting (see also below).
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
TR5 Safeguarding for Transport Infrastructure
ID sylw: 66547
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Friends of the Earth
Nifer y bobl: 4
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi
The proposed northern park and ride could be more controversial - there are very few, if any, locations where it would not have a serious impact on the landscape quality of the area.
see attached
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
Historic Environment
ID sylw: 66550
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Friends of the Earth
Nifer y bobl: 4
We support these proposals.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
HS5 Directing Open Space, Sport and Recreation Facilities
ID sylw: 66552
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Friends of the Earth
Nifer y bobl: 4
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi
needs to be refined to ensure that when new sports or community facilities are proposed on green field sites, planning consent is not granted for floodlighting, and that new facilities are not granted consent in 'areas of tranquility'.
Floodlighting can have a major effect on the openness of the countryside, both during the day and at night. Light pollution from floodlighting at existing facilities is a serious problem already in the district and it can for example have serious effects on wildlife and ecology, as well as affecting the quality of life for people who live nearby. We would refer you to the CPRE's 'Dark Skies' campaign, the fact that light pollution can be a statutory nuisance under the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act (2005), and particularly that the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) Planning Practice Guidance (paragraph 125) says: ' By encouraging good design, planning policies and decisions
should limit the impact of light pollution from artificial light on local amenity, intrinsically dark landscapes and nature conservation.'
NPPF Planning Practice Guidance (paragraph 123) also says: 'Planning policies and decisions should aim to: .. identify and protect areas of tranquillity which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason.'
see attached
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
Climate Change
ID sylw: 66554
Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014
Ymatebydd: Friends of the Earth
Nifer y bobl: 4
We support these proposals, except for the financial viability proposals in proposed policy CC3.
see attached