Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69942

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey

Asiant : Cerda Planning

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Proposed Modification 6 sets out a total of 17,577 homes which provides a buffer 4.5% (801 dwellings more) than the housing target of 16,776 set out at Modification 4.

- The 4.5 % buffer would only be sufficient to deal with very minor changes to the demand or. Accordingly, the Plan is not considered sound in so far as there is insufficient flexibility to cater for either i) sites not coming forward for development or ii) greater than anticipated levels of demand.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69943

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey

Asiant : Cerda Planning

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Modification 5 sets the OAHN at 600 dwellings per annum for Warwick District,
with an additional 332 dwellings per annum to meet the unmet housing demand from Coventry. This does not however account for the historic undersupply that must be dealt with in the first 5 years of the plan period or the 20% buffer, nor does it appear to account for the inevitable unmet housing demand for Birmingham.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69944

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey

Asiant : Cerda Planning

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Modification 17 notes that there would be a full or partial review of the Plan if changing circumstances could not be accommodated within the existing strategy.

Accordingly, the Plan is not considered sound in so far as there is insufficient flexibility to cater for either i) sites not coming forward for development or ii) greater than anticipated
levels of demand

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69945

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey

Asiant : Cerda Planning

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Land which immediately adjoins Allocation H48, south of Westham Lane, Barford is considered an excellent candidate for further allocation to meet need.

Combined with Allocations H48 and H22, residential development on this site would form an entirely logical and natural conclusion to the western side of the settlement

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69952

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey

Asiant : RPS Planning

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

OMISSION site: -
- site south of Southam Road within a sustainable primary service village
- close to local facilities, services and amenities
- Radford Semele well-placed to accommodate additional housing growth
- no significant landscape concerns or technical reasons not to bring site forward

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 69953

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey

Asiant : RPS Planning

Support is provided for site allocations to be provided on the edge of built-up areas as opposed to urban area.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 70037

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey

Asiant : Barton Willmore

Provision over and above the housing requirement is supported and adds to the soundness of the Plan by providing flexibility. the inclusion of safeguarded land is also important.

this will assist n demonstrating that the plan is aspirational and realistic; with the slight overprovision allowing for any slippages in the delivery of the strategic sites within the District - which may be particularly helpful given the proximity of a number of allocations to the south of Warwick/Leamington Spa - and maximising the chance of a five year housing land supply being demonstrable over the Plan period.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70038

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey

Asiant : Barton Willmore

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Agree with the justification for releasing sites from the Green Belt to meet the needs of the Housing Market Area. However, propose an amendment to para 2.38 as set out below

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70040

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey

Asiant : Barton Willmore

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Agree in principle with the proposed allocation of Site H28 for approximately 120 dwellings given it offers a sustainable and logical extension to the settlement of Hatton Park.
However, there is a strip of land to the east of the proposed allocation which is within the control of Taylor Wimpey adjacent to Ugly Bridge Road. In our view, extending the allocated area to cover the entirety of the land in Taylor Wimpey's control would form a more logical extension to Hatton Park. Moreover, the omission of this strip of land will render it redundant from any viable continued use as an agricultural landholding. Should the Council be seeking to enhance landscaping on the eastern edge of the proposed residential development, then we consider that this would be better achieved by including the land within the allocated area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 70042

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey

Asiant : Barton Willmore

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

fers a sustainable and logical extension to the settlement of Hatton Park.
However, there is a strip of land to the east of the proposed allocation which is within the control of Taylor Wimpey adjacent to Ugly Bridge Road. In our view, extending the allocated area to cover the entirety of the land in Taylor Wimpey's control would form a more logical extension to Hatton Park. Moreover, the omission of this strip of land will render it redundant from any viable continued use as an agricultural landholding. Should the Council be seeking to enhance landscaping on the eastern edge of the proposed residential development, then we consider that this would be better achieved by including the land within the allocated area.