No

Representation ID: 98974

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: (1) AG Family Trust 2024 & (2) N. Holdsworth

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

*Transport infrastructure appears to trump all other infrastructure types which are just as, if not more important, to ensuring quality of life.
*The pattern of development is over-reliant on strategic level growth requiring large-scale infrastructure projects. *Development to the east of Station Lane, Kingswood can be achieved in the short term without reliance on strategic transport improvements.
*Through reference to Figure 9 the suggestion is that there is too high a focus given to transport considerations in the emerging plan and that this might unduly constrain economic growth.

Yes

Representation ID: 99054

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Stephen Wyatt

yes

Yes

Representation ID: 99058

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Kevan Russell

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 99125

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Kevan Russell

I agree

No

Representation ID: 99301

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

This policy direction implies that transport infrastructure trumps all other infrastructure types with other types of infrastructure dealt with as after-thoughts.

If the pattern of development is over-reliant on strategic level growth that requires too many large-scale infrastructure projects to deliver it, then the scale of growth might be constrained.

Decisions on major investment locations seem to have been taken outside the key public transport corridors whereas a different approach appears to apply in relation to housing and smaller scale employment proposals. This suggests there is too high a focus given to transport considerations in the emerging plan.

No

Representation ID: 99330

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I do not agree with safeguarding land for road enhancements other than limited areas for safety improvements and small feeder roads. Upgrading trunk roads would be counter to the sustainable strategic objectives of the SWLP.
Safeguarding land for improving rail and construction of cycle routes would better support the sustainable strategic objectives of the SWLP.

Other

Representation ID: 99388

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steven Murray

N/A

No

Representation ID: 99460

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carolyn Haynes

The proposed infrastructure once again fails to look at requirements outside the wider Stratford on Avon area. There is already daily congestion on the A435 between Studley and Alcester, yet the Alcester plan includes enough houses to double it in size. Almost all roads in and around Alcester are single lane yet there's no plan to widen any of them. Getting from Alcester to Stratford at peak times always results in congestion and delays, yet the proposals don't go any further than Wildmoor.

Yes

Representation ID: 99576

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham

yes broadly agree

No

Representation ID: 99577

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Loades

Please take into consideration this proposed developments will have on the road B4087. This is already a rat-run to the M40 and is incredibly dangerous.

No

Representation ID: 99581

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jean Bull

All these proposed changes will use too much land and destroy too much habitat which would destroy wildlife beyond belief.

No

Representation ID: 99621

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Daniel Nutt

Using land for a Stratford to Honeybourne railway doesn't make sense due to:
* Tranquillity - Loss of a sustainable place free from traffic and noise to exercise, walk, run, cycle and walk the dog.
* Cost - £200m+ is absurd.
* Travel - People in rural South Warwickshire such as Long Marston and Honeybourne know of transport arrangements. Stratford to Warwick is already linked and it is once an hour and takes 30 minutes. Having this setup for Stratford to Honeybourne will not see people moving from their current arrangements of cycling along the Greenway or using bus services.

No

Representation ID: 99658

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Sue Bedford

No need for railway line or station at long marston to honeybourne and therefore won’t be financially viable. This was closed in the past. Stratford needs a bypass to avoid Clopton Bridge. Greenway is well used and should be expanded for wildlife. Only road infrastructure needs to be improved, not rail.

Yes

Representation ID: 99701

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford District Council Green Group

Rail must be favoured over roads.
The Sactra report must be noted - the more roads you build, the more traffic there will be - the induced use principal.

No

Representation ID: 99745

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steven Murray

SG20 - any development around The Graftons would impact on an already overburdened road network system that is frequently subject to road accidents and incidents. There is a dangerous risk when negotiating crossing over the A46 from the Graftons as there are no roundabouts or traffic light systems in place to assist when crossing traffic on this fast and congested road. Safeguards to protect the transport safety should be identified to meet these needs.

No

Representation ID: 100035

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Adrian Parsons

Some proposals are welcomed such as the preservation of land formerly forming the Honeybourne rail link, and other measures to facilitate public transport. However, the vast majority of the proposals will only increase the use of private transport and not enough is being actively done to increase the ease of access to, interconnection of, desirability and affordability of public transport.

No

Representation ID: 100140

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Ann Colley

Additional land to be taken up to relieve existing traffic congestion, and further congestion. Therefore, more countryside to be removed as well for the residential areas.

Yes

Representation ID: 100254

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

All of the infrastructure projects mentioned in the list for Stratford area are required to service the new developments in the district.

No

Representation ID: 100411

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr peter spreadbury

New roads attract new traffic from users who would previously never have travelled as the roads were not adequate. New roads bring new traffic, they solve no problems in the log run.

No

Representation ID: 100705

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Leanne Matthews

A viable and deliverable route must be found for the construction of a new ring road around Stratford on Avon.

Other

Representation ID: 100717

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Judy Steele

infrastructure development should always take into account wildlife and wildlife corridors - HS2 is a blatant example of how this doesn't happen on a large scale, I have no faith this will happen here we will end up with no open countryside, it will all be sacrificed to development

Yes

Representation ID: 101079

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr James Wilby

This should include safeguarding our remaining few hard strip runways as part of transport network, as sustainable aviation develops

Other

Representation ID: 101164

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Adrian Summers on behalf of the Summers Family

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

There is concern this policy direction implies that transport infrastructure trumps all other infrastructure types with other types of infrastructure dealt with as after-thoughts.

If the pattern of development is over-reliant on strategic level growth that requires too many large-scale infrastructure projects to deliver it, then the scale of growth might be constrained.

Employment generating development at Claybank Farm can be achieved in the short term without major improvements to the transport network.

There is too high a focus given to transport considerations in the emerging plan and that this might unduly constrain economic growth.

Other

Representation ID: 101264

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Bart Slob

I partially agree with Draft Policy Direction 6 but have concerns about clarity and prioritisation. The policy identifies multiple transport schemes but does not clearly prioritise essential projects. Rail infrastructure and public transport improvements must be prioritised over road expansion to support sustainable development. Additionally, there is no clear commitment to funding or delivery timelines, raising concerns that safeguarded transport schemes may not be implemented before major development occurs. Without guaranteed investment and clear phasing, development risks outpacing necessary transport improvements. The policy must secure funding, set clear priorities, and ensure transport infrastructure is delivered before expansion.

Yes

Representation ID: 101297

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

The Plan should safeguard land for proposed transport infrastructure, however it should also be clear as to how the infrastructure is to be funded and delivered, and how it is to support planned growth within the Plan (i.e. which developments will benefit from the infrastructure and therefore need to contribute to its delivery).

Yes

Representation ID: 101364

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Zoe Leventhal

Park and Ride proposals in WDC seems sensible

Yes

Representation ID: 101371

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Crump

The SW relief road, postulated alongside the present approved development of Long Marston Airfield, has still not materialised, with spiralling costs and no adequate contribution having been secured from the developer. This means that there is no additional transport infrastructure to underpin the sustainability of the site. Furthermore, there is absolutely no indication as to when, if ever, the Stratford to Honeybourne railway line will be re-opened. Until it does, it seems inappropriate to place any reliance on its underpinning any additional transport infrastructure to lessen the need for new residents to use their cars for transportation.

No

Representation ID: 101510

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Vincent Rollason

This development is not good for the area

Yes

Representation ID: 101572

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richard Yendall

Yes, entirely sensible

How about pedestrian underpass / overpass near to the bridgefoot car park to alleviate the huge congestion issues caused by traffic having to stop for the pedestrian crossing?

Yes

Representation ID: 101681

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Clive Henderson

The draft policy looks acceptable