No

Representation ID: 89846

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr SIMON BEACHAM

Site BW: - this development WILL NOT respect and enhance the existing neighbourhood character. It will be a sea of red bricks, red roof tiles and roads.

No

Representation ID: 90367

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Sankey

Leave alone!!

No

Representation ID: 90475

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jayne Jones

There is a complete lack of consideration with proposed SG areas for consdieration to be given to population density/existing infrastructure options. No evidence that consideration given to areas where expansion is viable as infrastructure already in place.

No

Representation ID: 90477

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Ward

This is a meaningless policy If you aren't going to be more specific because appropriate density varies according to circumstances.
My experience is that you take no notice of density in neighbouring areas and try to enforce the 30dph which leads to ugly over developed sites with insufficient parking.

No

Representation ID: 90813

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Maxine Mayer

If the SWLP doesn't stipulate density requirements the developers will do what they are already doing and apply absolute minimum standards. THE SWLP should be very restrictive to development in the villages and green built so the character of these places is protected from harm.

Yes

Representation ID: 90831

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Malcolm Fisk

Appropriate use of higher density housing to help regenerate town centres to provide a cohesive mix of affordable housing, shared workspaces, commercial and community spaces, in-line with the town's vision

No

Representation ID: 91155

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Janet Johnson

It’s barely comprehensible s o little pointless asking the question.

Yes

Representation ID: 91241

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Again fine words that are hard to disagree with.... but how will they be applied in practice.

Other

Representation ID: 91412

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Partial agreement. A site densification should only be determined by a fundamental criteria / checklist justifying the business case for said proposed development site. I would like that criteria spelt out in the plan to a broad but not exhaustive level. An example would be most beneficial. I understand the SWLP document complexity but it would help tremendously if you improve the communication and how it is communicated so that the audience understands in laymen terms. Numerous times in this document you forget who your audience is.

Yes

Representation ID: 91609

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

This is important. There has been a move to increasing the density of housing with smaller gardens and narrow roads. This needs to be resisted and appropriate densities determined and adhered to in planning.

No

Representation ID: 91666

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Duncombe

Though I understand the pressure on building, increasing density is not a good social move, as was proved by the 1960-70's high density developments, and it reduces the appeal of the area.

No

Representation ID: 91742

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms miranda maloney

N/A

No

Representation ID: 91745

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms miranda maloney

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 92228

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Laura Gibb

I don’t know. It’s hard to trust when you see the ravages the current house building is wreaking on our town.

No

Representation ID: 92234

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Sara Burney

This is the countryside; it is not an inner-city area where dense housing is either wanted or appropriate. Furthermore, people DO NOT want 20-minute neighbourhoods. We don't choose to live in the country so that we can be corralled into dense concrete jungles. If we wanted to live in a 20-minute neighbourhood we'd live in a large town or even a city; South Warwickshire is predominantly countryside, and should not be conflated with an urban desert.

Yes

Representation ID: 92367

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

yes it should be flexible and based on existing patterns of development

Yes

Representation ID: 92526

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Fairburn

We need homes for single people and young couples and the best way to build these is to allow multiple occupancy homes to be built within developments of single family homes (to avoid social housing ghettoes). If Paris can look beautiful with 5 and 6 storey homes, we ought to be able to have 3 or 4 storey buildings for such need.

No

Representation ID: 92562

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Do not agree with any alteration to green belt or any development on it

No

Representation ID: 92614

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Phillip Johnson

The housing density assumptions are too great. Where development takes place on Green Belt land, the Council must ensure that at least 50% of new houses are affordable. The Council must reject developers protestations that this is too high a figure. The Council has previously yielded to developers on Affordable Homes issues.

Other

Representation ID: 93334

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

I support and would encourage as much densification as possible. Dense housing requires less land, encourages nearby infrastructure, and is more suitable for 20-minute neighbourhood principles.
Car parking requirements should be reduced if nearby infrastructure is accessible.

Yes

Representation ID: 93484

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Denise Holroyde

Agreed

Yes

Representation ID: 93572

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Shelagh Marshall

Yes, utilise and maximise existing sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 93785

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Campbell

agree

Yes

Representation ID: 93793

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Warwick District Green Party

-It is not surprising that developers don’t want optimal densities as they have a fiduciary duty to maximise profit, rather than what is good for residents overall.
-Specifying suitably high densities in urban areas and the centre of new settlements is crucial for effective 20 minute neighbourhoods.
-The Local Plan provides an opportunity to radically re-design and re-provide housing in our towns, through much higher densities and the provision of multi-level living i.e. apartment provision. This is the only practical way to meet housing need where the demand is, making use of existing infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 94048

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Stuart Mace

By implication therefore the design code would mean that in previously sparsely populated areas the development will also be of very low density.

Other

Representation ID: 94508

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Clement Silverman

Intensification should be given a higher priority within this plan. The benefits are laid out in the draft policy, but I think it can go further. In Warwick, Leamington and Kenilworth for example there are several surface car parks that have no business taking up so much space in our town centres. Replacing these with multi-storeys and high-density housing will unlock thousands of homes in locations that are attractive, well connected and low-carbon. E.g. Chandos Street, Leamington Station, Abbey End and the huge car park at Leamington Shopping Park (Shires) etc. No-brainer!

Yes

Representation ID: 94571

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

but local authorities involved need to ensure that they have resources and expertise on hand to give competent advice.
These are is a policies often stated and equally often overlooked. It needs constant of vigilance of enforcement

No

Representation ID: 94675

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Gala McBride

The huge housing proposal of 8,500 houses for B1 will overwhelm the surrounding area - traffic volume is already hugely increased because there have been 3 large developments (Union View, Hatton Park and Hampton Trove) very recently. We have suffered delays with roadworks for the whole of 2025. If there is an accident or other hold-up on the A46 or the M40, Warwick becomes blocked with traffic and the B4117 is overwhelmed with traffic. B1 appears to have little infrastructure so inhabitants would have to go to Warwick to shop, etc. Warwick Hospital is similarly at breaking point.

Yes

Representation ID: 94795

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment

Yes

Representation ID: 94834

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

Yes