Yes

Representation ID: 86069

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 86142

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Clive Corrie

Land for this purpose should not be sacrificed from existing Green Belt areas.

No

Representation ID: 86453

Received: 25/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carole Johnson

Wedgnock Farm along with the proposed large development at Hatton would put intolerable pressure on rural local roads. When there is accidents on the M40 traffic comes through Warwick and the surrounding lanes which currently are unable to cope. These two proposed developments would cause gridlock in this area. The traffic in this area was recently severely disrupted during the road works outside the Hatton Locks development. Local people use the narrow lanes in the area to avoid this congestion which would only increase if these two developments were approved.

No

Representation ID: 86614

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Rachel Smith

Shipston is not an ideal location as travel networks are insufficient & our nearest station is 10 miles away

Other

Representation ID: 86653

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

The strategy to focus economic development alongside existing and planned public transport and housing focusses the development on the West of Warwick/Hatton area.

The Gaydon area is dependent on JLR for employment. Jaguar itself has been for many years. Land Rover is profitable but is a "big bet" for the area, in a competitive, fast evolving market for vehicles. The large, energy hungry vehicles that Land Rover make are of dubious sustainability.
Relying on this employer in the Gaydon area is highly risky. There should be diversification of employment around Gaydon to ensure that the area is economically sustainable.

No

Representation ID: 86910

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

-

Other

Representation ID: 87016

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

What about the redevelopment of areas in town centres. This seems to be missing.

No

Representation ID: 87196

Received: 06/02/2025

Respondent: Mr R M Boorman

You should not be supporting of facilitating development in these rural areas. Areas for employment growth need to be in established built up areas such as Warwick, Leamington or Stratford, and not in the middle of the countryside where they have no public transport links

Yes

Representation ID: 87231

Received: 06/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Oliver Jacques

I think the suggested employment growth site at Red House Farm (SG09) is a good location given its proximity to the M40. It is also a sensible site for a Park & Ride scheme to serve Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash.

Yes

Representation ID: 87388

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

No

Representation ID: 87570

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

Do not agree

No

Representation ID: 87968

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

Brownfield sites should be made use of before any greenbelt. Greenbelt is supposed to be protected.

Yes

Representation ID: 88154

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

We need innovative jobs to attract high calibre workers to the area.

Yes

Representation ID: 88316

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: British Film Institute

Agent: Ms Giulia Bunting

BFI is the UK’s lead organisation for film and the moving image.
BFI’s storage facility at Lighthorne forms an integral part of the BFI’s National Archive. BFI is currently looking at options to expand its operations at this long-established brownfield site.
BFI supports draft Policy Direction 12 which recognises that sites meeting business and community needs in rural areas may have to be found adjacent to or beyond existing settlements, and in locations that are not well served by public transport. BFI supports that the use of previously developed land will be encouraged where suitable opportunities exist.

Yes

Representation ID: 88407

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Maurice Stokes

These sites are ok as they straddle the M40 corridor and are currently got correct infrastructure in place to grow.

No

Representation ID: 88419

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Hayles

2 of the 3 proposals will negatively impact Bishop's Tachbrook. The Banbury Road has fast nose to tail traffic at peak hours causing long queues for residents and those from Whitnash reaching the M40 or Warwick. The Mallory Road/Banbury Road junction is dangerous to use with frequent collisions (large pieces of car debris there again today). Repeated calls for junction improvement by residents have been ignored. Further developments along the Banbury Road which cause yet more traffic will make travel to and from Bishop's Tachbrook in that direction even more difficult.

Yes

Representation ID: 88516

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Annette Pharo

These sites have road infrastructure in place to accommodate employment growth.

Yes

Representation ID: 88667

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree with the three sites chosen

Other

Representation ID: 88758

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 88816

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Yes but I would hope not all of the Red House Farm site would be used as it will impact on Bishops Tachbrook leaving it no longer separated from Leamington and Whitnash.

Other

Representation ID: 88970

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Nigel Rock

Draft Policy Direction 12 Location for Employment Growth
We broadly agree with the approach, but have considerable reservations about effective methods to ensure that only small scale B8 type uses are permitted in the Gaydon area. Robust policy controls are needed to constrain any warehouse type of use in this location.

Yes

Representation ID: 89025

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Preference should be given to sites that will attract quality employment - Science and technology, R&D, Manufacturing, administration. Large scale warehousing, retail warehousing, garden centres should only be provided with cler evidence of unmet demand.
High levels of design and landscaping are required in all cases

No

Representation ID: 89240

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

Rather than a few large industrial sites, I'd prefer to see industry placed nearer to the settlements where workers live. This would mean a more even spread of employment opportunities throughout South Warwickshire, and also make the new town settlements like LMAGV better self contained towns. It would also reduce some of the transport demands and potentially save money on building large items of transport infrastructure just to permit large scale commuting across the county.

Yes

Representation ID: 89396

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Amanda Knight

No additional comments

No

Representation ID: 89506

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Mylene Reilly

Again these projects concern new layouts and additional roads ! Before creating these roads may I suggest you concentrate on local roads which are a disgrace before creating further potential pothole projects !!

No

Representation ID: 89577

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Martin

I disagree with the proposal to use land at Wedgnock Park Farm (SG07) and think the alternative option at Red House Farm is a better option. Road access to SG07 would have to make use of the already congested Birmingham Road and the A46 whereas the other option has direct M40 access. I also strongly object to the use of green belt land when there are other options available. Green belt should not be used just to get a solution delivered more quickly. We have to think of the environmental impact of always selecting green belt.

Other

Representation ID: 89660

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Simon Cook

The Plan proposes 125ha, the upper limit of development. This is unnecessary and will have larger impacts on important environmental assets and habitats in the area, as well as designated sites and protected species, and does not align with UK 30% by 2030 targets.

The allocations are directly next to Chesterton Wood, an important Local Wildlife site, and extremely close to the River Avon and Tributaries LWS, Redlands Brake PLWS, New Waters LWS, Budbrooke Farm Woodlands and Black Brake Plantation LWS, development on which would have detrimental effects for wildlife and climate change targets.

No

Representation ID: 90094

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Catherine Hewson

Evidence recommends that between 75 and 125ha of land be allocated for Employment Growth, however the Plan proposes 125ha, the upper limit of development. This is unnecessary and will have larger impacts on important environmental assets and habitats in the area, as well as designated sites and protected species, and does not align with the Government’s 30% by 2030 targets.
There is a lack of up to date employment need data, and no evidence for Strategic Industrial Need before 2045.
The allocations would have detrimental effects for wildlife and climate change targets.

No

Representation ID: 90450

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Louise Stewart

The statements are factually incorrect. HS2 will not provide access to the North and is already perceived as a white elephant that adds no meaningful value to London commuters.

No

Representation ID: 90487

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jayne Jones

No plans for employment growth for rural areas. Proposal to double the size of Shipston, which has high unemployment but no provision for employment and no regular transport links to travel to other towns for employment.