Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 98

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93936

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carina Taylor

Representation Summary:

Yes, but only on Brown Field Sites, not on green belt land

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94068

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Stuart Mace

Representation Summary:

The use of active travel routes must give consideration of the distances involved, the geography of the area (are there lots of hills, places to cross rivers safely alongside existing road traffic) and the provision of adequate storage and showering facilities at workplaces if located at great distance from where people live. The routes outside of urban areas all require adequate streetlighting, gritting, street cleaning to remove debris, and segregation from other road traffic including buses.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94472

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Farrow

Representation Summary:

n/a

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94516

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd

Agent: Stansgate Planning

Representation Summary:

The Core Opportunity Area supports investment in Aston Martin Lagonda (AML)

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94592

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

in principle

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94612

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Rainier Developments Ltd

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Warwick, as one of the main urban areas, should remain the focal point for future employment growth in the Core Opportunity area. Rainier consider that opportunities to build on existing clusters of employment to the south west of Warwick should continue to be explored. This is a highly sustainable and proven employment hub with potential to deliver agglomeration benefits via the co-location of related businesses whilst also accommodating a mix of employment close to planned housing growth and labour supply in Warwick, but also other parts of South Warwickshire owing to the accessibility provided by the A46 and M40.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94844

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

no further comment

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94853

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

Representation Summary:

In order to reflect and comply with Strategic Objective 1: "Providing sustainable levels of growth in the area", the Core Opportunity Area description should be widened to include the rail corridor which runs parallel to the M40. Once HS2 releases pathways on the route, employment clusters should be assessed and designed to maximise use of rail.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94975

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Darren Downes

Representation Summary:

Bearly/Wilmcote: It is one of the furthest locations away from the major investment sites!! Just because two farmers offer their land for sales that could accommodate 6,000+ houses, does not mean the we should convince ourselves that some facts carry enough weight to agree with this development location. Surely the developments should be located near the major investment locations for environmental reasons, unless you plan cycle paths from Bearly to these locations.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95118

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Robert Clarke

Representation Summary:

There is too much reliance placed on the existing road network, and an over-reliance on people commuting significant distances from residential areas by road.
There needs to be a more integrated transport plan, that considers availability of rail and other forms of public transport to access the employment sites.
The provision of a 'central opportunity belt' effectively eliminates collaboration between businesses in the development region and more established business in the surrounding counties.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95920

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Representation Summary:

yes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96040

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Marshall

Representation Summary:

In relation to the specific site I support the plan.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96318

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Representation Summary:

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96566

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Representation Summary:

Agree

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96681

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Representation Summary:

Yes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96865

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Representation Summary:

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) supports the allocation of a Core Opportunity Area including Alcester to build on existing employment hubs and in particular to support inwards investment within this Area.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96926

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Representation Summary:

only if it is outside the Green Belt

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97138

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Yes

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97798

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Representation Summary:

I support this where it is outside the green belt.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98507

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Holly Farm Business Park

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Representation Summary:

No, the concept seeks to spatially link together a number of strategic locations that are not closely linked. This appears to be the case in an attempt to justify all of the strategic allocations. In reality the links between Warwick/Leamington, Kenilworth with Coventry are strong and meaningful but the attempt to link across from Gaydon to the Bidford area far less so. The Core opportunity Area should be reviewed.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98558

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: SupremeTech

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

SupremeTech fully supports the identification of the Core Opportunity Area (COA) for employment growth and the objective to build on existing employment hubs. The policy direction states that this area will be the focus for new employment development. Land off Princes Drive, Kenilworth sits within the COA.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98804

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Deeley Properties

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

Deeley Properties fully supports the identification of the Core Opportunity Area for employment growth. This sets out that key clusters are brought together through the A46 Trans Midlands Trade Corridor and the central section of the M40. The policy direction states that this area will be the focus for new employment development. Land under promotion by Deeley, Land at Banbury Road, Gaydon (Site ID 711), sits within the COA. It is therefore clear that this site offers the best strategic employment growth opportunity to meet Stratford’s needs which aligns with Road Opportunity Area 8 as per the WMSESS (2024).

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98829

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Bryer Estates Ltd

Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

Representation Summary:

We are supportive of this approach which aligns with paragraph 85 of the Framework

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99043

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: MPTL

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

Yes, we support the approach identified in Policy Direction 13. Stoneleigh Park is identified as a Major Investment Site within the Core Employment Area. We fully support this area being the focus for new employment development.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99319

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Garry Rollason

Representation Summary:

I agree with the designation of a Core Opportunity Area but this should not encroach on the existing Green Belt.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99346

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Representation Summary:

Broadly agree, however, as with housing, focusing on large employment sites at the expense of smaller sites is a concern.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99501

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Diane Wilson

Representation Summary:

Object to any impact on our existing heritage, green spaces and boundaries and wildlife habitat

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99710

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Loades

Representation Summary:

Instead of developing large commercial buildings in the countryside, why not consider working alongside farmers and encouraging the maintenance of their land, with the increase in production of fresh produce for locals. This could be an opportunity for employment, as well and a boost in the economy for British produce.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99732

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Welford on Avon Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Any further development of housing and commerce south of the River Avon should be conditional on new road infrastructure crossing the River Avon to the East and West of Stratford Upon Avon.

The infrastructure should be put in place first - at least one new river crossing that removes traffic from local villages such as Clifford Chambers, Long Marston, Welford on Avon and Binton.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100117

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Adrian Parsons

Representation Summary:

There is too little detail as to how improvements to transport infrastructure will be meaningfully improved, and far more needs to be done to vastly improve the use of public transport before we will see increased capacity on the roads. Moreover, increasing the uptake of public transport should not be seen as a means to increase the desireability of private car use.