Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 93936
Received: 02/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Carina Taylor
Yes, but only on Brown Field Sites, not on green belt land
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 94068
Received: 02/03/2025
Respondent: Stuart Mace
The use of active travel routes must give consideration of the distances involved, the geography of the area (are there lots of hills, places to cross rivers safely alongside existing road traffic) and the provision of adequate storage and showering facilities at workplaces if located at great distance from where people live. The routes outside of urban areas all require adequate streetlighting, gritting, street cleaning to remove debris, and segregation from other road traffic including buses.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 94472
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Michael Farrow
n/a
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 94516
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd
Agent: Stansgate Planning
The Core Opportunity Area supports investment in Aston Martin Lagonda (AML)
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 94592
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership
in principle
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 94612
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Rainier Developments Ltd
Agent: Turley
Warwick, as one of the main urban areas, should remain the focal point for future employment growth in the Core Opportunity area. Rainier consider that opportunities to build on existing clusters of employment to the south west of Warwick should continue to be explored. This is a highly sustainable and proven employment hub with potential to deliver agglomeration benefits via the co-location of related businesses whilst also accommodating a mix of employment close to planned housing growth and labour supply in Warwick, but also other parts of South Warwickshire owing to the accessibility provided by the A46 and M40.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 94844
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 94853
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group
In order to reflect and comply with Strategic Objective 1: "Providing sustainable levels of growth in the area", the Core Opportunity Area description should be widened to include the rail corridor which runs parallel to the M40. Once HS2 releases pathways on the route, employment clusters should be assessed and designed to maximise use of rail.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 94975
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Darren Downes
Bearly/Wilmcote: It is one of the furthest locations away from the major investment sites!! Just because two farmers offer their land for sales that could accommodate 6,000+ houses, does not mean the we should convince ourselves that some facts carry enough weight to agree with this development location. Surely the developments should be located near the major investment locations for environmental reasons, unless you plan cycle paths from Bearly to these locations.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 95118
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Robert Clarke
There is too much reliance placed on the existing road network, and an over-reliance on people commuting significant distances from residential areas by road.
There needs to be a more integrated transport plan, that considers availability of rail and other forms of public transport to access the employment sites.
The provision of a 'central opportunity belt' effectively eliminates collaboration between businesses in the development region and more established business in the surrounding counties.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 95920
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96040
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Andrew Marshall
In relation to the specific site I support the plan.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96318
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Southam Town Council
Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96566
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96681
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: John Dinnie
Yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96865
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Alcester Town Council
Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) supports the allocation of a Core Opportunity Area including Alcester to build on existing employment hubs and in particular to support inwards investment within this Area.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96926
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery
only if it is outside the Green Belt
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97138
Received: 26/02/2025
Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council
Yes
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97798
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery
I support this where it is outside the green belt.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98507
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Holly Farm Business Park
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
No, the concept seeks to spatially link together a number of strategic locations that are not closely linked. This appears to be the case in an attempt to justify all of the strategic allocations. In reality the links between Warwick/Leamington, Kenilworth with Coventry are strong and meaningful but the attempt to link across from Gaydon to the Bidford area far less so. The Core opportunity Area should be reviewed.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98558
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: SupremeTech
Agent: Delta Planning
SupremeTech fully supports the identification of the Core Opportunity Area (COA) for employment growth and the objective to build on existing employment hubs. The policy direction states that this area will be the focus for new employment development. Land off Princes Drive, Kenilworth sits within the COA.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98804
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Deeley Properties
Agent: Delta Planning
Deeley Properties fully supports the identification of the Core Opportunity Area for employment growth. This sets out that key clusters are brought together through the A46 Trans Midlands Trade Corridor and the central section of the M40. The policy direction states that this area will be the focus for new employment development. Land under promotion by Deeley, Land at Banbury Road, Gaydon (Site ID 711), sits within the COA. It is therefore clear that this site offers the best strategic employment growth opportunity to meet Stratford’s needs which aligns with Road Opportunity Area 8 as per the WMSESS (2024).
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98829
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Bryer Estates Ltd
Agent: Mr Will Whitelock
We are supportive of this approach which aligns with paragraph 85 of the Framework
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99043
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: MPTL
Agent: Harris Lamb
Yes, we support the approach identified in Policy Direction 13. Stoneleigh Park is identified as a Major Investment Site within the Core Employment Area. We fully support this area being the focus for new employment development.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99319
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Garry Rollason
I agree with the designation of a Core Opportunity Area but this should not encroach on the existing Green Belt.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99346
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Broadly agree, however, as with housing, focusing on large employment sites at the expense of smaller sites is a concern.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99501
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Diane Wilson
Object to any impact on our existing heritage, green spaces and boundaries and wildlife habitat
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99710
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Loades
Instead of developing large commercial buildings in the countryside, why not consider working alongside farmers and encouraging the maintenance of their land, with the increase in production of fresh produce for locals. This could be an opportunity for employment, as well and a boost in the economy for British produce.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99732
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Welford on Avon Parish Council
Any further development of housing and commerce south of the River Avon should be conditional on new road infrastructure crossing the River Avon to the East and West of Stratford Upon Avon.
The infrastructure should be put in place first - at least one new river crossing that removes traffic from local villages such as Clifford Chambers, Long Marston, Welford on Avon and Binton.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100117
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Adrian Parsons
There is too little detail as to how improvements to transport infrastructure will be meaningfully improved, and far more needs to be done to vastly improve the use of public transport before we will see increased capacity on the roads. Moreover, increasing the uptake of public transport should not be seen as a means to increase the desireability of private car use.