Yes

Representation ID: 86072

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

No

Representation ID: 86455

Received: 25/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carole Johnson

Any refurbishment of any office space in Warwick should be NOT at the expense of the historical appearance of the area.

Yes

Representation ID: 86660

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Focus office development on town centres to make town centres vibrant during the day and early evenings, and to enable office workers to walk to work.

No

Representation ID: 86912

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

-

Yes

Representation ID: 87019

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

But this must include the decarbonisation of office spaces too. In Leamington, this has to support other sectors not just gaming, such as marketing, consulting, training and development sectors,

Yes

Representation ID: 87391

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87573

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 88412

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Maurice Stokes

Refurbishment is essential for economic growth.

Yes

Representation ID: 88416

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Annette Pharo

Stratford on avon, as stated in the study, has enough office space as it can always refurbish existing sites if required.

Other

Representation ID: 88480

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Hayles

It is important that the impact of heavy traffic volumes in the vicinity of high employment areas is addressed for surrounding villages. Measures are needed to ensure safety at road junctions is improved where long queues form at peak times as villagers struggle to turn out onto fast flowing routes of nose to tail traffic. Such junctions exist at Charlecote and Barford on the A429 near to the Warwick University Wellesbourne Campus and at Bishop's Tachbrook where Mallory Road and Oakley Wood Road junctions with Banbury Road are highly dangerous due to JLR and M40 traffic.

Yes

Representation ID: 88671

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 88819

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Yes but there are other factors affecting eg the gaming industry, which is an adequate electricity supply and also car parking facilities within Leamington Town Centre. Not all workers can afford to live close by, transport is not always reliable and existing car parking is either expensive or full.

Yes

Representation ID: 89030

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89241

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

There does seem to be quite a lot of office accomodation on offer at the moment so this seems reasonable. However one is left to wonder if the working from home move created by Covid pandemic will continue to suppress the need for office space, and if this will still be the case when new 6000-10000 home settlements are built. Those might need office space (or co-working space) allocated within them, as well as houses with good working-from-home features (which is part of another section of this plan).

Yes

Representation ID: 89400

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Amanda Knight

No additional comments

No

Representation ID: 90453

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Louise Stewart

You evidence feedback that existing office space is outdated and not fit for purpose. In that case the owners need to update it, rather than build new space. Also the shift towards hybrid working probably still hasb’t bee fully realised, so that proportionately less offices will be needed overall, however there needs to be a significant investment in stable high peed connectivity to enable effective home wrorking and collaboration.

Yes

Representation ID: 90489

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jayne Jones

I agree - but also to consdier as brownfield sites for residential

No

Representation ID: 90581

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Terry Simmonds

Everything related to the SWLP appears to be; increase and improve the employment office spaces where the employment office spaces already are, resulting in anyone in the far south of South Warwickshire having to travel to the areas rather than bring those employment opportunities to the rural areas.

Yes

Representation ID: 91157

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council agrees with the suggestions.

Yes

Representation ID: 91261

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Other

Representation ID: 92380

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree in principle but should be allocated in major large district towns with residential development.

Yes

Representation ID: 92598

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

So long as existing spaces are utilised and no further development is needed especially non on green belt

Yes

Representation ID: 93889

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Comley

Refurbished or replaced in town centres.

No

Representation ID: 94596

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

we do not agree the downgrading of Stratford upon Avon. It is possible that no immediate need is demonstrated for either refurbishing or building new offices but over 25 year period or so of the plan it is not realistic to maintain that judgment given the growth potential of the town. Please see the Partnership statement submitted.

Other

Representation ID: 94864

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Supporting development that seeks to provide a substantial element of affordable office space is accepted BUT this must be within a BUAB.
Experience has shown that an approved application for office accommodation can subsequently be demonstrated as lacking demand and the application converted into residential. Attempts to breach Settlement Boundaries by offering "supported development of office accommodation" with subsequent variation must be avoided.
Similarly if the development takes place but not occupied Change of Use should not be permitted. The developer should revise tenancy type and/or charges

Yes

Representation ID: 95922

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

yes

Yes

Representation ID: 96035

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Marshall

This is a good strategy.

Yes

Representation ID: 96320

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

Representation ID: 96564

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 96694

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Yes